First you allow a submission with a summary that completely contradicts the article; then you put the wrong specs in the headline when it's clear from both the summary and the article itself what the correct specs should be?
Get yourself a cup of coffee, come back and try again.
I certainly hope that the news orgs will include a warning that they should be using this only as one part of an attempt at anonymity. With the NSA's beam splitters hard at work in every major ISP backbone, it would be quite trivial for them to trace this back.
I think you misunderstood what I meant. 99% of the interaction with the therapist can be reproduced digitally. Of course it still comes down to it being a matter of somebody wanting to change, but that doesn't have anything to do with what means they use to interact with their therapist.