Comment Re:Why a decade later (Score 1) 629
> In IV - VI, we find the story of a character who's very evil who finds redemption.
Redemption? Vader was responsible for the deaths of Billions! I don't really consider redemption an option in his case.
> In IV - VI, we find the story of a character who's very evil who finds redemption.
Redemption? Vader was responsible for the deaths of Billions! I don't really consider redemption an option in his case.
I was thinking it was a dark matter effect. But Mond makes so much more sense.
>> you just can't come back to tell the rest of us about it afterwards.
You can. You just need to pick the right deity.
I use rsync to a zfs file system. A couple of cron jobs to fire off rsync and do zfs snapshots makes for a nice TimeMachine-like solution without TimeMachine.
An story is not official/real until it has a dupe. More dupes means more 'real'.
Look at how well it worked for Chef on Southpark.
The professor had to expect something like this. It's like playing chess. He'll respond with his next move, etc...
It's interesting to watch this and the Camara case unfold. Much better than 'Lost' or Reality TV because the results actually do effect me.
I made this point in an earlier thread. The defense new that they didn't have time to put together a proper defense. They knew they had several valid reasons for an appeal so let the case tank while they worked on their longer range goals.
Let me guess. You just got done watch 'Being There' again, right?
My theory is that the attorneys really needed more time to prep for the case. Knowing full well (or praying) that this verdict will also be set aside gives them several months to get more completely prepared for a third trial.
The next three releases are apparently Toy Story 1 & 2 (in 3D) and 3.
That's more than enough for me.
I run a Mac Pro. OS X 10.5.7 was just released so I'll probably reboot when I install that sometime in the next couple of weeks. My last downtime was 62 days ago when I needed to shuffle around some hard drives.
Finally, we have a good reason to 'think of the children!'.
A better name might have been 'wikipediasux.org' or something similar. No confusion, then, that it's another Wikipedia site.
The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the `social sciences' is: some do, some don't. -- Ernest Rutherford