What you really need (I'm not American) is a preferential voting system. You will never get another party in a first-past-the-post system.

The issue here is that this law is not normally used to cover the theft of a house (in fact this is the first time it has happened in Australia). Imagine if this was a car, someone buys it (innocently) and uses it for 2 years.

Would you prefer the car back after two years of use, or the value of it when it was stolen?

This is a pretty unusual case and as we know the law is one size fits all.

Not if a reasonable man would have suspected it was stolen. This law protects the innocent, such as this case, someone who purchased a house through a legitimate real estate agent.

If you buy a DVD player from the back of a pub and it turns out to be stolen, then you have to give it back and would be lucky not to be charged with being in reciept of stolen goods.

This does, although I am still not sure how the scammers got hold of the original certificate of title. Here in WA this is still a piece of paper and the settlement agent must have it to complete the transaction.

It can be replaced although it is extremely difficult to do so (trust me, I lost one).

All smothering.....

No seriously I think the "bloodless coup" bit was more a statement of disappointment that we did not thin out the political gene pool a bit with a few lynchings.

While I like to think of myself as being a open minded as the next person, I do not believe that equality should extended to the head of government.

Right now I am sure the other countries are laughing at our choice for PM.

We appointed a wranger, that right a red head as our prime minister! What she is female? That irrelevant, a red head did you hear!

:)

Good point

Quote "The easiest switch would be to go to OpenOffice.org from Microsoft Office. This switch is easy because not only is OpenOffice.org superior software in every respect ...".

Looks like a nice impartial artice.