That is absolute nonsense.

With zero empirical evidence.

>>>>The problem is not the lack of time spent on creativity, it is a lack of creativity from schooling.

Semantics no?
Decent review, and reviewers observations seems correct.

Make sure you read the second, updated edition.

Even better than the first edition.

So you are saying Bamford is beyond approach?

According to you, the New York Times review which he quotes should not have been published either.
Should Slashdot have a policy stricter than the NY Times :)

Yes, Bamford has contributed a lot, but that does not give him license to misrepresent facts and connects dots that are not there.

Certainly. Just make sure it is legitimate and verifiable.

As opposed to what goes on at Durban II. Ironic conference which turns into an anti-Israel roundtable by some of the worlds most oppressive regimes.

What makes you seen to know his 'affiliation'?

Thanks.

AC's also seem to be predisposed to believing these conspiracy theories.

I don't think 'that' was the point of the review.
You may want to look at it just once more....

Sorry, but what is 'AC'?

That is actually a good point.

Your comment makes no sense.

Why can he claim that Homeopathy is worthless, because the various tests prove it is.

>>>It is said about Homeopathy that it works on a subtle level

And what 'exactly' is that subtle level?

>>>I doubt the author is an expert in subtle, subliminal or realms other than just the sense to claim that homeopathy or other such things are worthless.

Which means what?

Can you please clarify what your point is?

Yes, it may have indeed worked for you.

But as the review states, and the book reiterates, the plural of anecdote (namely your comment) is not data.

Chiropractic lacks formal data. Formal statistics. It is a sham.