We also have written evidence that Frodo set forth from the Shire in order to destroy the One Ring before it fell into the hands of Sauron. But so what?
Which is more plausible, even as a fictional work, to reality than some of the fanciful imaginations of staunch evolutionists that have been passed on as "scientific" theory and pushed in the academic community as absolute fact (and laugh anybody who disagrees with them out of the journals).
And a mere 6000 years ago too. All that business about 70,000 and 1.2 millions years ago is a distraction to test our faith.
We have written evidence of a 6,000-year-old Earth, and we have pseudo-scientific evidence of a 4.5 billion-year-old Earth (where not a single dating method works in this time scale, hence it is pseudo-science, not science). The only people who can't conceptualize a 6,000-year-old Earth are those who assume that decay rates and geologic deposition processes are constant rather than slowing down due to entropy. I observe a car slow down to a stop light, so therefore all cars drive 10 MPH.
New York... when civilization falls apart, remember, we were way ahead of you. - David Letterman
