Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:A wolf in sheep's clothing (Score 1) 103

Consumers may have a choice to not buy such locked content, but by offering legal protection for digital locks, the government has created an added value incentive for publishers to utilize them

Yeah, and just where's the added value for the publisher in a product that consumers refuse to buy? Just say no to locked content. Most of it is mass-market crap not worth having anyhow.

Comment Re:the original RISC? (Score 4, Informative) 56

Well, "RISC I" was the first VLSI RISC processor, as described in:
D. A. Patterson and C. H. Sequin, "RISC I: A reduced instruction set VLSI computer," in Proc. 8th Annu. Symp. Comput. Architecture, Minneapolis, MN, May 1981, pp. 443-457.
The architectural principle is generally credited to John Cocke, on the IBM 801 minicomputer, though others published first. Some (like me) might argue it goes back to Seymour Cray's designs at Control Data for the CDC6600 PPU but those definitely did not have a minimal instruction set, just a small one with a 6-bit opcode field.

Comment Remote control (Score 1) 138

So we have meters that can remotely command thermostat set-back, and others that can romotely disconnect power entirely. If any of these have security problems on the command side, they've essentially opened the door to crooks (or cops) cutting off your power, likely with no evidence trail created. If they shut it off and nobody opens a curtain it's a pretty safe bet that there's nobody home.

Comment D'oh (Score 1) 1

Just get the manufacturers the hell out of the retail business. Let the retailers sell whatever brands they want. Without the perverse incentive of proprietary dealerships running repair shops, the makers might have a reason to start building products that aren't designed to maximize repair cost. It's been a scam for decades, and it has to be fixed at a fundamental level.

Comment Re:YMMV (Score 1) 3

It's easy to call names, but the truth is parents have multiple kids who will from time to time simultaneously take off in different directions. Unless you are prepared to tether them, an occasional parental panic is inescapable. Best choice: don't take little ones with you. Second best: do the Disney thing, with id bracelets checked at the gate. If they live to get to the gate.

Slashdot Top Deals

With your bare hands?!?

Working...