Even better answer: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#InternalDistribution
No, in that case the organization is just making the copies for itself. As a consequence, a company or other organization can develop a modified version and install that version through its own facilities, without giving the staff permission to release that modified version to outsiders.
This should answer your question: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLRequireSourcePostedPublic
"The GPL does not require you to release your modified version, or any part of it. You are free to make modifications and use them privately, without ever releasing them. This applies to organizations (including companies), too; an organization can make a modified version and use it internally without ever releasing it outside the organization."
I voted "hovering ads", because (unlike say, sound ads) adblock-plus doesn't seem to block those, and the stickiness/lag in movement really grates against my OCD-side (I bet I'm not the only one, judging by the current poll status).
Noscript solves those.
Seems that most of the larger (well-known) *.govs doens't haven't deployed dnssec. I tried cia.gov, fbi.gov, nsa.gov (!), state.gov, whitehouse.gov, ins.gov, irs.gov... state.gov was the only one i found having published a DNSKEY rr. (I just picked a few at random I knew)
If you consider the border patrols trustworthy, sure. I don't. I'd bet the only "crime" Peter Watts committed was of arguing back.
Magnet link is an URI, your browser is supposed to send it to it directly.
http links are URI:s to, but rtorrent supports those (using libcurl). But libcurl does not support magnet-links
You summarize my thoughts exactly. And I would also add that this deal is flamed by another party: the FSF. (fsf.org seems to be down atm, but here comes the link: http://www.fsf.org/news/2009-09-google-book-settlement-objection )
"But under the proposed settlement, works released under the GFDL and similar licenses are lumped in with works under full restrictive copyright. Google would therefore be given permission to display and distribute these works without abiding by the requirement to pass the freedoms guaranteed under the GFDL on to Google Books readers."
... named after the language it was implemented in.
They can face ongoing fines for non-compliance.
Monique Wadsted and the judge are both arbitrators for the swedish ccTLD (.se) Registry IIS/.SE's Alternative Dispute Resolution program.
Thank god we still have Lund, where you can get 100mbit for $7/mon. Gotta love it.
GP was talking about colo etc.. Swedish consumer connections are unmetered (with the exception for 3g).
The one day you'd sell your soul for something, souls are a glut.
