Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Users disagree with him (Score 1) 980

Don't get me started. I too had a bug report resolved as "works as expected". Another one of mine was closed as a duplicate, but Apple's bug tracking software won't let you view other people's bug reports. So I couldn't follow its progress anymore.

Apple's bug reporting policy is a joke. On the user.

Comment Not one, ever (Score 3, Interesting) 228

I haven't received a single robo-call in my life. Sure, I sometimes get unsolicited calls but there's always a live human at the other end. Even these are rare -- less than 1 per month. And usually from places I have had previous business with or the occasional survey.

I hate to turn this post into an America-bashing socialist diatribe but the American phone market is a great example how an under-regulated market is not in the best interest of the consumer.

Comment Re:Wrong (Score 1) 861

Why do you think we must go to expensive doctors for healthcare? They haven't even existed for most of humanity.

For most of humanity the average life span was 30 years. It is now more than double than that. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_expectancy

A huge factor in that improvement is not only that people get older, but also that fewer children die. Both is directly attributable to the existence of doctors.

Comment Re:Canon or Nikon (Score 1) 569

Worst. Advice. Evar.

The OP simply wants to take good pictures of his family and friends. He does not need a big camera that he has to haul around, he needs a camera that is small enough to have always on him, i.e. a point-and-shoot. I have heard good things about Lumix (IIRC, a Panasonic brand) although I've never owned one.

Secondly, you pay a hefty premium for Canon and Nikon gear. They do have advantages (mainly availability of secondary accessories), but you get the same features and quality for less money if you buy Pentax, Olympus or Minolta.

Comment Re:This is obviously the future (Score 1) 243

Not necessarily. Using the most modern farming techniques, we produce far more food than the population that grows it actually requires. The problem is, the areas that have the largest (and most quickly growing) populations, are the areas that use the least effective farming techniques.

The problem is waste in the developed world. We already produce more than enough food to feed everybody on the planet. But half of what is produced for Europe and the US is thrown out before it even reaches the consumer. Meanwhile our food is still so cheap that the sustenance farmer in Africa cannot compete. It's not that his farming techniques are not effective enough, it's that our industrialized food production is much cheaper and he can't sell his crop. He loses his livelihood and now the nation is dependent on foreign inports.

Comment Re:No love for financial institutions. (Score 1) 694

You have to ask what is the purpose of taxes to begin with ...

The German word for tax is "Steuer" and it provides a hint to an answer to your question. The verb "steuern", of which "Steuer" is the noun form, means to regulate, control, govern and to steer. (E.g. a car steering wheel or a boat ruder wheel is also simply called Steuer in German.)

In other words, taxes are not only a means to provide income to the state but also a means of regulation by the state. And that is the main purpose of a tax on financial transactions. It's not a way to provide additional income (which would be marginal anyway) but to discourage behavior that is a burdon on the system.

Slashdot Top Deals

MESSAGE ACKNOWLEDGED -- The Pershing II missiles have been launched.

Working...