The supreme court is the one who set the "miller test", as far as i know that still stands.

That's a nice thought, but they aren't challenging "every little thing" the government does, they only challenge things they don't like, and there aren't a similar number of "flaming crazies" challenging other laws that other americans view as blatantly unconstitutional or imposing on freedom.

Take "obscenity" laws for instance, blatantly unconstitutional and yet those who oppose such laws aren't running around the streets casually with semi-automatic weapons or making references to "2nd amendment remedies" when things don't go their way.

If this were a case about a law requiring everyone to purchase a Bible, these same people would be actively supporting the law or at least remaining silent, because that's what they do, they only run their mouths and cry about freedom when it suits their personal causes.

We know all about it, doing something with that information is another issue.

Referring to this from the chrome os architecture pages

That's the step where the system checks it's integrity. Google has said all along that users would not be forced out of their own devices by overzealous security measures.

http://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/chromiumos-design-docs/security-overview

MORE closed? No, because Google has always said that users could get into the core os if they wanted to without resorting to exploits and hacking.

Know how to get those type out of your way? Mention that the place is out of meatball subs, but you've got a special one just for her.

Also a good way to get arrested, so weigh your options carefully.

What the fuck is this comment? I expected at least THREE separate blatant stereotypes, a racial slur and some kind of reference to Apple users being gay. Go back and try again.

-iPhone 4 owner

Isn't a flagoogle a unit of time and not distance?

If your penis was a car, would it be an 18 wheeler or a hatchback? Please phrase your answer in a way that would make Alex Trebek's ears flutter in glee.

Most of the iPhone users i've talked to say its been just fine on AT&T. I've got an iPhone 4 and it's working great, 3G speeds are plenty fast, and calls haven't dropped at all. Voice sounds bad, and AT&T might be worse in that respect than other carriers, but poor call quality seems to be part of a trend that followed the switch to digital phones, they just sound worse than the older analog ones and definitely worse than landlines.

Most of the AT&T hate seems to be coming from users in large cities like SF and NY. I expect that the signaling issues that TechCrunch and others have reported on that are specific to AT&Ts network are hitting hardest there.

Which news channel shows films at 11?

And implementing what this stupid MP wants to implement wont do anything but shift the excuse.

Now it will be "Right-o, dear mum, i'm ever so confused about how the opt-in switch became all chumba wumba n'such........fancy a spot of tea?"

That's how the brits talk, i know because i've seen American TV.

They make more from one person forced to settle than thousands of buyers on itunes

I honestly can't believe it's not butter.

Which I already addressed in my first comment.

Why don't high density American cities have cheap superfast connections?

Look at the price. The ISPs continue to believe they deserve hundreds of dollars for connections like this even in a major city where population density is extremely high.