Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Good law (Score 1) 227

I had a little Google and came up with https://ec.europa.eu/growth/se...
Which links to a PDF at the end containing the study.
Which is too long for me to read - this is Slashdot after all.
Also, they haven't brought in the directive yet - they've voted that we need one. Check the one from (2005?) to see what they'll probably come up with. It'll be a honed version of that, probably.

Comment Re:Good law (Score 4, Insightful) 227

They've tried explaining it, but people are not listening - it's not the port *on the phone*, it's the port *on the charger*, and the *charger's* specifications. So all *chargers* must have a standard port, and a *cable* must go from that to whatever the phone manufacturer has on their phone.

They haven't sufficiently explained why they feel compelled to intrude into a part of manufacturing that doesn't need intrusion.

I can plug my Android devices into my Apple Charger, and vice versa. I can plug either into my charging/connection ports in my car. My charging cables came with my devices.

Pretty amazing that the EU has so few problems that they feel the need to impose political solutions to non problems.

What's next? Trying to force the world to use their 50 Hz mains electricity and wall outlets?

Why do you think that is (hint: EU ruling a decade ago)...

Then why do they have to do it again? Or do you like taking your technology orders from politicians?

I certainly prefer it to what we had before (each device coming with a completely different charger - remember those 'drawer of chargers' we used to have?).
I trust our government a whole lot more than I trust random companies to have our best interests at heart. EU / US difference I suppose.

Comment Re:Good law (Score 4, Insightful) 227

They've tried explaining it, but people are not listening - it's not the port *on the phone*, it's the port *on the charger*, and the *charger's* specifications. So all *chargers* must have a standard port, and a *cable* must go from that to whatever the phone manufacturer has on their phone.

They haven't sufficiently explained why they feel compelled to intrude into a part of manufacturing that doesn't need intrusion.

I can plug my Android devices into my Apple Charger, and vice versa. I can plug either into my charging/connection ports in my car. My charging cables came with my devices.

Pretty amazing that the EU has so few problems that they feel the need to impose political solutions to non problems.

What's next? Trying to force the world to use their 50 Hz mains electricity and wall outlets?

Why do you think that is (hint: EU ruling a decade ago)...

Comment Re:Good law (Score 5, Informative) 227

They've tried explaining it, but people are not listening - it's not the port *on the phone*, it's the port *on the charger*, and the *charger's* specifications.
So all *chargers* must have a standard port, and a *cable* must go from that to whatever the phone manufacturer has on their phone.

Comment Re:It is about freedom (Score 0) 190

Yes, we in Europe, with single-payer medicine basically roll a die and play Russian roulette each time we visit our 'free' hospitals. Luckily I managed to have multiple surgeries and live beyond 40, which is really old over here with our surgeons mostly playing on their phones during surgery. I.E.: You are a moron.

Slashdot Top Deals

And it should be the law: If you use the word `paradigm' without knowing what the dictionary says it means, you go to jail. No exceptions. -- David Jones

Working...