People still use that?

Once I used Resolve I never looked back.

Sure, borrow more money and further increase the debt. It's "no big deal" that just the finance payment on the debt is now the LARGEST item in the "budget", above and beyond even defense. But hey, Congress gets kickbacks so why should they care right?

For the rest of us outside the beltway who have to live with the inflation caused by this ever increasing debt load - please STOP. No more, this is not an INVESTMENT, but rather just another expensive inflation causing debt bill we have to pay!

We need more nuclear, and for the near term, more natural gas power plants.

Why depend on undependable weather for energy when there are better solutions?

I will ONLY buy Brother printers. I've had some for more than 10 years with zero issues, plus no DRM or other nonsense.

Yes, the planet is greening and it is easier to grow food now. But that's not what the WEF wants, especially you growing your own food. How else can they control you as hunger is a VERY strong motivator?

The carbon they want to reduce is YOU.

I guess compared to 480p, but other than an upscaler, what can they do as the original graphics are blocky to begin with.

China's limitation is production. They have old process node equipment and cannot make cutting edge chips so this is a NON ISSUE.

Not that I expect any lawyer politicians to understand anything about this.

What I'd really like is to be able to open more than one instance of the program so I can have two or three copies open for reference, etc.

All new reactors should be designed to burn cheep and abundant Thorium, not Uranium.

Our ambition is indeed to do as much as possible to pad our pockets with green energy kickbacks, also in terms of driving out fossil fuels,

Nobody explores for "fossil fuels".

They are called hydrocarbons, and they are used for a lot more than just fuel. Modern life doesn't exist without them.

Where is life most diverse? The equator.
Where is it spare? Northern latitudes.

Why is a temperature increase, or CO2 increase (more plant life) such a bad thing? It's not.

This CO2 cult madness is really out of control.

If copyrights were restored to the original intent (to encourage more works by being able to profit from them for a LIMITED time), this would go away.

In a digital age, as opposed to horse and buggy, 7 years should be sufficient for any copyright, with an optional 7 year extension. Then the works enter into the public domain, as intended.

I dealt with Adobe about 15 years ago writing direct to Postscript drivers (large format "plotters"). Nobody left at the company had any idea how Postscript actually worked, it was horrible. How they haven't gone bankrupt is quite a feat.