Comment Re: Google acting like Microsoft (Score 1) 91
But only for Chrome versions released 10 years ago. We need to end the scourge of woefully out of date Chrome!
But only for Chrome versions released 10 years ago. We need to end the scourge of woefully out of date Chrome!
Yes. They advocated they move away from IE6 to Firefox, Chrome, oh wait or IE8.
Next up: Google conspired to kill Windows XP..... After even Microsoft gave up on it.
Are Airlines made out of wood? Last time I checked they weren't so extrapolation from a small wooden wing to an airliner is not possible.
Hosting sites? You mean sites that already have full control over everything on the page?
They are relatively tame, highly restrictive and can only affect the site they belong to. If someone can inject a service worker somewhere then you have bigger problems since they'd also be able to inject regular JavaScript with far fewer restrictions.
FDA typically approves things that are healthy for you, so I'm not surprised that N2 isn't approved for human use.
Has there been a police complaint? The police can't investigate unless someone tells them something illegal has been done.
A wine and dined office would be using Outlook not Windows Mail. Which is still terrible but possibly slightly better
Based on my experience with my 680 class hexacopter (with Pixhawk autopilot), there was certainly no software control of it when it crashed at all. The software just can't fly like that.
Next guess would be a motor failure but that doesn't work either as hexes and octos can fly with diminished performance with a failed motor.
It actually looks like half the drone lost all power, while the other half didn't hence the flipping motion.
I wonder if they power it from two batteries, one handling half the motors and the other handling the other half.
A dodgy connection for one battery would cause exactly what the video shows.
If that is the case then a pair of back to back diodes between the batteries would have prevented that problem.
Somehow I doubt your sensing of traction and brakes is anywhere as good as a car's electronic traction control and ABS.
For sensing, computers can do everything we can do far better, more accurately and faster.
Why?
Humans use visual sensors exclusively for driving, humans would have had the exact same accident.
Trying to say that autonomous cars cannot have any accidents is silly and is an arbitrarily high bar.
I'll be plenty happy if they are just 2 - 3x less likely to have an accident compared to human drivers. That would be a massive improvement to society.
Wow yep that completely makes it worthwhile!
I too went straight from composite to hdmi. I have since gone back and now use a 10m optical cable to my wall mounted TV. No TV cabinet or anything, ultra clean and the speaker amp is at the opposite side of the room.
It is quite a nice simple solution for less common set ups. It works fantastically.
Erm the coax connector is digital, in fact the exact same digital data as optical.
Coax noise affecting the digital signal? Not Gonna happen.
Yep because by downloading the key over the internet, it means it will never be left unencrypted and exposed in system ram at any stage.
*facepalm*
Well considering NPAPI has already been killed off, I doubt that's much of a problem.
The sooner all the animals are extinct, the sooner we'll find their money. - Ed Bluestone