Comment Godspeed (Score 1) 1521
You are lucky that you leave with the satisfaction that arises from a job well done. Congratulations on your achievement and best of luck in your future life. You'll be missed.
Time to move on.
You are lucky that you leave with the satisfaction that arises from a job well done. Congratulations on your achievement and best of luck in your future life. You'll be missed.
Time to move on.
I'm a complete idiot with this sort of thing, but why did they orbit so far away (9k miles)? It surely can't have that great of a gravitational pull, can it? Why not get as close as is prudent (or is 9k miles the prudence limit)? It seems like the closer the better for studying the thing.
As someone far more knowledgeable than me has pointed out elsewhere, they did this because astronomers are not sure about the exact mass of the asteroid and therefore want to play it safe until they have more data, at which point they plan to lower the orbit.
Drugmakers are already required to keep track of adverse drug events that arise during clinical testing. Much of this information is reported to regulatory agencies on almost a daily basis and there's a lot of work going behind the scenes to make sure the information is reliable, consistent and keeps patient privacy.
I can understand to some extent why drugmakers aren't too keen to jump into this. There is little use in adding yet another database into an already busy workflow. This new database is guaranteed to be different from many in-house solutions currently in use, so you will need to train people, get them used to the new process, etc. just to input the same data the regulator already receives. IMO this won't be worth the effort in the eyes of many drugmakers unless you get regulatory agencies involved.
I am not saying in general this is not a worthy cause. We currently have more data derived from genomics (and all the other -omics) than we can analyze. However to be successful this guys need to make sure they aren't duplicating the functionality of the myriad of public databases already out there.
...in this great blog. Also check out the rest of the posts, if you're a chemist you'll definitely will enjoy the "stuff I won't work with" series.
What's your point? If we didn't have equipment, we couldn't see the rings around Saturn. We couldn't see Uranus let alone Neptune.
You probably mean we couldn't see the rings around Jupiter instead of Saturn. Saturn's rings are quite visible from any decent backyard telescope.
You could probably get more than that if you rotate 90 degrees on the same spot those pixels that have a color gradient.
Last update - 13:55 04/02/2007
U.S. website: Mossad killed Iranian nuclear physicist
By Yossi Melman, Haaretz Correspondent
A senior nuclear physicist involved in Iran's nuclear program who died under mysterious circumstances two weeks ago was killed by the Mossad, according to a report released in a U.S. website this weekend.
It seems that more and more mathematicians are using a new, high level language named "research student".