Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Time to do more research + more than recklessne (Score 1) 282

I must say, I'm struggling to understand the source of your animus. I'm simply suggesting that shifting priority from treatment to prevention might be politically difficult when so many appear to see obesity as a moral rather than policy failing. Perhaps political influence on healthcare services is less of a concern where you are.

Comment Re:Time to do more research + more than recklessne (Score 2) 282

How much cheaper would it be if we fixed this when the fat person is in their 30s than treating diabetes, heart disease, and joint breakdown in their 60s?

Enormously, but doing so is politically toxic. Interventions are expensive and complicated, and ask awkward questions about agency, responsibility and society. Good luck to anyone wanting to make those kinds of nuanced arguments in this day and age.

Comment Fire them all into the sun (Score 2) 271

This country is an absolute and irredeemable shambles. The Conservative party recently spent weeks engaged in a leadership contest and found Liz Truss, a person so badly out of her depth that within a week of her effective premiership, set the nations finances on fire.

Having then selected the least appropriate prime minister we've arguably ever had, they now want to install the loser of said contest. Jesus wept. The entire nation is now effectively held hostage by the collective mental breakdown of the 'natural party of government'. With no means to force a general election, us mug punters have to wait two years for an election while whichever ineffectual toad 'wins' their unwanted unpopularity contest clock watches until the bell tolls for their grotesque parody leadership. The mother of parliaments. What a joke.

Comment There's a simpler explanation (Score 1) 266

Our entire economy is built on ever rising house prices and infinitesimal interest rates. If we build enough houses, house prices go down. People who own houses vote more than those that don't. People who own houses also vote for those who prevent that happening. Thus, complex planning rules suit everyone. Except, of course, those who don't own houses.

Submission + - UK PM candidate says mistake to 'empower scientists' during Covid pandemic

Oxygen99 writes: The Guardian reports UK Prime Ministerial candidate and ex-chancellor Rishi Sunak was furious about school closures, and added trade-offs of lockdowns were not properly considered by experts. In an interview with the Spectator magazine to be published Saturday, the former chancellor said the response of the UK Government to the pandemic should not “have empowered the scientists in the way we did."

Comment Failing Upwards (Score 5, Insightful) 34

That's Baroness Harding who went to school with David Cameron and was CEO of TalkTalk during one of the UKs largest and most damaging data breaches. I imagine the first part is what got her the job rather than the second.

The UKs response to coronavirus has been an object lesson in incompetence in which every single aspect of their management has been an embarrassing shambles. They've had to be dragged kicking and screaming toward constructive choices after exhausting every other bad option under the guise of following the science. It's an absolute disaster, of which, this debacle is just the latest.

Slashdot Top Deals

Quantity is no substitute for quality, but its the only one we've got.

Working...