Hm. The very first paragraph on the home page says:

Use the same framework to develop apps for the web and for all major platforms, desktop and mobile

sounds like a focus to me!

Since it claims to produce desktop apps, it would be nice if the samples for Enyo actually included some desktop apps.

But in addition to that, if you drank that one soda fairly quickly, it won't do a lot of harm to your teeth; if you sip it all day it will be terrible...

So I think one soda, drunk in a few minutes, would probably be fine.

For the same reason, I'm nervous about all the new features being added to browsers such as WebRTC, video, and 3D support. All of those can and will have bugs and greatly increase the attack area. It seems tedious to have to repeat the cycle of "add awesome new feature, wait for exploits, exploits get serious, disable feature" for every brilliant new idea.

So you'll only occasionally be accused of pedophilia. Good to know!

I would be quite embarrassed to have asked this on slashdot. Next up: why doesn't magic work?

This sounds very interesting me, because in the last few years I had some major life changes, and afterwards found that I really quite dislike going into this state that makes for really productive programming. I now try to tackle it much more piecemeal and process oriented, and while I might be more thorough and thoughtful, I'm pretty sure it's much slower.

So my conclusion is that this alpha state for programmers is something really unhealthy and maybe programming is quite damaging ...

You're right it's not black and white: but the problem is, even if you enjoy it, you probably don't enjoy doing it ALL THE TIME. At work, you have no choice; you've got to keep doing it, even if you don't currently feel like it or there's some aspect you don't enjoy.

Yes, there really can be too much of a good thing.

For years, Microsoft has been stuck on making everything "Windows". "Word for Windows". "Windows Live Messenger". "Windows Phone". Their marketing department seems convinced that it's their strongest brand and needs to be spread to absolutely everything, no matter how irrelevant.

They clearly now have committed the whole company to it, building the Windows logo into the company logo.

Personally, I think it's tedious and repititive and of little value. But they clearly aren't going to let go now...

I bought a cheap Kobo reader, and it's been a smooth transition from reading paperbacks - rarely - to reading ebooks regularly.
The availability of a store for instant gratification is nice, although it's still severely limited in range (maybe a Kobo thing).
The web browser is too crude to use daily, but I think shows that it would be quite nice to read web pages on an e-Ink device.

The Kobo has a nice looking UI, but everything else is a bit clumsy; PC software was clunky, store is clunky, performance is patchy. I just got it because I had some vouchers and it was cheap. And for plain reading, it's fine.

Does it really? Or is that just a hypothetical? I would imagine HFT is only worth doing in markets that are already liquid.

In other news, glaziers are experiencing a boom from the number of broken windows.

Shoot Em Up was kind of in this vein, and a lot of fun

My impression was there was huge progress from 1995 to (say) 2005ish. But after that things slowed. Essentially the Linux desktop was good enough, but Linux as a platform is now held back by other non-technical things: the kernel "no ABI" philosophy, the fragmented distributions, Windows is now also "good enough", specific applications that businesses rely on (Office, Photoshop, etc) even if there are equivalents.

Huh? Facebook has pretty stated that their strategy is to try major, risky changes at high speed and retract them if necessary. A careful, backwards-compatible, regression tested release process is the opposite of what they do.

So: I would say anyone trusting facebook with their critical data is a fool.

Yes, indeed that does answer the questions, but that's not really what Linux users probably have in mind :)

Then it's a matter of "launching a new console", which is an extremely difficult problem (mostly - getting big game houses on board and marketing $$$ to be visible to consumers).