Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Not really (Score 1) 92

The game is actually smaller than it once was when it was more popular. It's losing popularity because it's not that fun any more and is littered with bugs. Just like Peleton it achieved unexpected popularity thanks to the pandemic. It's now a victim of its own success. Cheaters arrived en mass with no solution given. The way 3 studios were forced to maintain it on a silly release cycle made bugs that appeared and were fixed reappear with apparently no real communication between studios to help in fixing them.

Oh sure, a few people probably have quit for file size, but it's a pretty small number in comparison to what their player base was. At least compared to the number of people who have quit because they aren't having fun any more.

Comment Re:Focus on mission management my ass (Score 2) 81

This was sold as a retrofit of existing aircraft. You don't develop and try to sell a new aircraft to the army that they hasn't asked for. This allows them to more cheaply develop the technology, get their foot in the door and put them in a better position to pitch and win a contract for brand new aircraft.

For the military the advantage is leveraging this technology to cheaply make boneyards full of retired F16s, F4s, and other aircraft back into viability. Of course this goes back to the original comment that in deed, killing machines is certain a goal, but not the only.

Comment Re:Focus on mission management my ass (Score 4, Insightful) 81

Actually the primary use case for this is medical evac and resupply. For resupply it's a no brainer. For medivac it reduces a crew in danger by 2, presumably you still need the medics.

This is largely funded by Sikorsky, not Boeing who would be doing it with Apaches. It's not so much about making a killing machine as it is for Sikorsky to have a drop in product that keeps their products in high demand.

Comment Likely more harm that helped (Score 2) 289

It allowed restaurants to give the appearance they were safe when they really weren't. You had people happily obsessing over their mask while they were outside walking into the restaurant and sitting in their little plexi glassed cubicle to eat thinking they were somehow safe. Studies showed that indoor dining remained a vector for spread, even with the plexi glass and 25% occupancy.

Comment Re:I don't get it. (Score 1) 110

This is an ITAR violation, not a top secret or similar DOD violation. Once a program is labeled ITAR even the most benign things about it now become ITAR controlled. Considering it's only a $13M violation the reality is this is a slap on the wrist to make sure they do better rather than a major breach in technology.

Comment Re:amazing (Score 1) 93

Poles are typically owned by the electric utility. Often places with municipal internet do it affordably because they also own the poles. It's mostly a red tape issue than cost. My issue with space based is it seems to me to be a lot more cost effective and easier to roll out a good 5G network to most people. Space is absurdly expensive up front. Seems to be 5G will do to this what broadband internet did to directv and dish.

Slashdot Top Deals

Remember the good old days, when CPU was singular?

Working...