Well as long as a fact checker has said itâ(TM)s false we can all breath easier

Yes. Yes they are. I actually monitor both (and consider Al Jazeera to be the least biased). CNN is probably a little more unsubstantiated froth-at-the-mouth bullshit than RT but both full with obvious spin and bullshit. You are reading propaganda without even a hint that it is spin. Itâ(TM)d be worthwhile stopping and thinking. All American mainstream media that I watch is uncritical and full of propaganda to one extent or another. And yes, of course Russian media is. But youâ(TM)re an idiot if you think youâ(TM)re getting facts.

1965. And I endorse that post. Also this particular campaign contains the most intense propaganda Iâ(TM)ve ever seen including stuff I studied in school re wwi &wwii If you take ANYTHING at face value from msm, whether RT or CNN then youâ(TM)re a fool

Absolutely! Youâ(TM)re not so important that you get to put the entire company at risk.

So you suspect Korea ... or Trump?

Why ask me what the random combination is? Did I mention zinc? Step outside, calm down and take a breath. Your idea that itâ(TM)s all about redefining things is silly. Science is all about testing things, deciding what doesnâ(TM)t Work, and move on. It is not wrong to look at drug combinations. Thatâ(TM)s done all the time. I take a couple of pills, one which depends on another, and that other does nothing much on its own. I do remember zinc being suggested early on in connection with that malaria drug so it makes sense to test. If it doesnâ(TM)t pan out - cool. Science takes a step. Although itâ(TM)s important to look back occasionally. Thatâ(TM)s how we got stainless steel. But in this context - expecting you meant epidemiologist wasnâ(TM)t that ridiculous. But then, this is the Internet. Sensitive unthinking assholes are everywhere.

Lol âoeetymologistsâ probably are. I think you meant epidemiologists.

Itâ(TM)ll be another 5-10 more years before the next launch date. I donâ(TM)t expect to see IPv6 as anything more than a novelty in the next decade. Maybe when we get to the year of Linux on the desktop we can have a more concerted effort to use it. Iâ(TM)m actually more surprised that we donâ(TM)t see more bad actors utilising this as a protocol as itâ(TM)s on by default and no one much is monitoring it, as no one much is using it.

That was my first thought too.

Really? They're up to SIX digits now? Been away a while

I prefer a local client that downloads attachments - podcasts, pdf etc. My preference is feedreader - but to be honest I only look at it every couple of weeks. I get most updates via twitter. - and follow people mainly for the interesting stuff they give me.

Not only do we (NZ) not have such regulation - our law explicitly excludes recognition of the validity of anything designed to prevent something playing in NZ. IE if the DRM stops you playing something here - there's no reason to fear anything if you bypass the DRM to play it (providing the "it" was legitimately obtained) http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1994/0143/latest/DLM1705866.html

What? ITIL is about as far from Open as you can get. Intellectual property page

Oh - it's for sale if you feel like buying it (but you probably aren't eligible) see an article on the "for sale"

Meh whatever. I've got Nokia lumia 710 supplied by work and quite like it. I used to have android but really don't miss it. Regardless of what the haters say - its not bad