Incidence is down along with the death rate, and that is despite continuing improvements in detection.

Ah, yes. The classic Argumentum Googlei.

I thought not.

What other times they did what? Did you RTFA?

Still waiting for you to enumerate all the ways in which Monsanto is so obviously unethical that it would be absurd to suggest otherwise.

What are you talking about? Caught doing what? Do you even RTFA?

Or maybe you should consider looking at the source material:

http://baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/...

This has never happened.

I suggest that you read the article you linked to. That you are holding up a mythical bogeyman was in fact established in the court case the article is about (OSGATA v. Monsanto).

Looks pretty ordinary to me, as well as cherry-picked. It looks like Henry I. Miller may have done something unethical by not disclosing a conflict of interest, or possibly shared authorship. John Acquavella told Monsanto that it would be unethical to do something, and Monsanto and Acquavella both say that they didn't in fact end up doing it. Is it unethical to propose something, have it characterized as unethical, and then choose not to do it?

Did you RTFA?

Absurd, how? Can you enumerate a few of Monsanto's unethical acts? AFAICT, despite the popular theory that they are horrible, they're actually a pretty ordinary company as ethics go. Most of the beliefs people seem to have (e.g. that they sue farmers over accidental cross-pollination) are myths.

Why? The claim was that family farms are being shut down or being turned into factories.

Nonetheless, family farms accounted for 88% of farmland in 2012, and 94% in 2016.

You apparently didn't get the point. I didn't say the fact that cancer is declining is evidence that Monsanto is somehow saving people. I'm asking for evidence that they're killing them. The presumption here is that Roundup is causing fatal cancers, and since Roundup use is way up since the advent of RR crops, we should expect a dramatic signal in cancer rates if that is the case. So where are the victims? In fact, most people believe there has been an increase in the cancer rate (many think it is skyrocketing), so stories about evil Roundup kick in their confirmation bias. They have to be pointed at the actual statistics to learn that no, the overall cancer rate is actually declining—this is so profound a correction to their worldview it occasionally causes them to think about what else they may have got wrong.

Despite extensive study, no one is able to identify any increase in individual cancer rates attributable to use of Roundup; the most anyone can say is that non-Hodgkin's lymphoma might be correlated.

Do i really have to explain this to you, or are you just being disingenuous?

By protecting yield, intensification methods such as GMOs improve biodiversity by reducing the amount of land area required for agriculture, which leaves more land to the wild.

Weeds adapt to every form of control. Pull them by hand and they break off at the stem and regrow. Roundup is one tool among many.

Family farms comprised 99% of U.S. farms in 2016, which is up from 97% in 2012.

https://www.ers.usda.gov/publi...

No, i really didn't.

The parent claimed Monsanto was KILLING AMERICAN CITIZENS. I merely wonder where the piles of dead people are. I suspect it is news to the AC that cancer in the U.S. has been declining steadily for a long time.

Not only did i not prove that's related, i didn't even claim it.

Not really, but you fail basic reading comprehension.

What's really amazing is how they're able to KILL AMERICAN CITIZENS with a horrible carcinogen whose use has increased thousands of percent in the last two decades, while still having the actual cancer rate decline in the same period of time. Dastardly!

https://seer.cancer.gov/statfa...

Using statistical models for analysis, rates for new cancer of any site cases have been falling on average 1.1% each year over the last 10 years. Death rates have been falling on average 1.5% each year over 2005-2014.

Yeah, sooo evil. Must be why they keep getting this award. [eye-roll]

https://finance.yahoo.com/news...

The Human Rights Campaign (HRC) has once again named Monsanto as one of its “Best Places to Work for LGBT Equality.” This is the ninth year Monsanto has been honored by the civil rights organization. The distinction comes with the agriculture company earning a perfect score of 100 percent on the HRC’s annual Corporate Equality Index (CEI).