it is better we not survive.

they end.

i second the question

half a good answer, thank you.

i speak for all life on this planet, not merely human.

we have done immense harm.

you can see the same thing written clearly in the archaeological records, over and over again, cities grew too big, resource collection became too intensive, the surrounding land became a dust bowl and barren.

we have now done this to the whole planet.

how (unprintable) ignorant can a species be?

if we do not fix this, this very soon, we die.

will anyone even notice this reply?

or care?

read the premise wrong, got it mixed with a simpler problem, way less smart than i think i am.

author says "an infinite number of such paths do in fact exist" on a dodecahedron, and links to an article in the Journal of Experimental Mathematics.

have only read the abstract, however it does not claim to find an infinite number of paths, and an infinite number of paths is plainly not possible on a finite 'hedron.

you do not need a lot of maths to see this, as far as i know.

am i wrong?

thank you very much, i get what this is about now.

you seem to miss my point, and frankly i must admit i do not get yours..

Adobe are highly suspect and (i hope) almost dead (or should be) by now.

i am saying that, if this practice continues, we would be forced to produce PDF readers which allow the same filtering of, and control over, postscript language contents, that web browsers currently have over hypertext language contents.

i say this is not a bad thing, we were headed there anyway, i think, and everything i am saying is at least five years out of date.

anything is better than (unprintable) flash.

html5 is good, postscript's forth like syntax may be arcane to some, however is equally capable, in it's own way.

i happen to really like RPN type syntaxes, so personally am all for this.

when did this come into effect, please?

is there a list of who is selling what?

is this "only in america" or worse?

here in canada, i gather, we do it because america told us to.

we could stand to lose imperial units too, please and thank you.

however the fractional measures are useful as such, and should remain.

all of this soon, would be good, please.

downloading a bundle instead of discrete elements could be more efficient, or it could be a nuisance, depending on your needs.

sites deploying bundles only would probably be forced to provide discrete elements also, simply through demand pressure.

furthermore, Brave and the slash/editor seem to forget that a PDF reader can be a browser too, and is equally capable of discerning and making choices about what to display, and how to display it - IF we take the time to improve the reader code.

this will probably have to happen, if these bundles become a thing.

personally i think there are both advantages and problems with the bundling approach, therefore i am confident it will remain an option, an alternative, to hypertext browsing as we know it.

i doubt bundles will replace what we know, and i think screaming about them is something of a luddite attitude.

it is just progress, i think.

yes, make bundles an option that must also be backed by discrete store.

the entire article is inspirational, plain truth well spoken, important information.

"Sunlight is the best disinfectant, and open source is that sunlight in technology."

exactly what we all need to know, if we did not already.