While this method may be effective in reducing the mosquito population in the short term, does it work in the long term?

I searched for news about the long term effects after the Brazil experiment, but couldn't find anything. I remember reading an article which said that after some years (2?) the mosquito levels were back nearly to what they were before, but I couldn't find that now. Maybe someone else knows of it, or maybe I mis-remember. Or perhaps there's some new information now about how well it works in the long term, although the article didn't mention any.

All other concerns aside, the effectiveness of the method should also be considered. If it doesn't have the impact it claims to have, it's pointless to do it.

Highly relevant for this, but nobody has yet mentioned - certainly none of the sources linked (although I feel they should have, for proper reporting).
The same policy/rule was a problem already in 2020, and it was already suspended once, for 4 months. So this is not a "new issue" but a "continuing issue", i.e. "it's still a problem".

https://www.euractiv.com/secti...

Since the suspension has already happened once, I imagine it wouldn't be so big hurdle to have that happen again, if enough pressure and will is there.

Here you go: https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11423... (it's in Finnish)

Here's the original article (in Finnish): https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11423...

YLE offers also news in English, but the content is much limited compared to what they provide in Finnish.
That said, there's one article I found on this topic in English, https://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/...
This is different content to the above Finnish text, and with different person offering commentary.

Here's the link (it's in Finnish): https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11423...

They have an English news site too but this is not there, only a small part of the content gets translated to English.
They do have an article on the topic in English too, but it's different content than the above, and commentary is from a different person:
https://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/...

An interview in local Finnish news with the head of laboratory in the Finnish Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority says that releases like this happen usually a few times every year. The statement didn't discuss whether the levels seen this time were also usual, but it does seem to imply it. It was also said that most times the source of the release does not get identified.

So there's no real major news here, stuff like this seems to happen every now and then.

The difference between the terms of Gravity Waves vs. Gravitational Waves seemed confusing at least to me, so here's an article.
https://medium.com/@GatotSoeda...

"Gravitational waves are waves that vibrate through spacetime itself, as a result of gravitational forces as Einstein predicts in 1916. Gravitational waves are ripples in spacetime in accordance with Einstein’s theory of gravity.

Gravity waves are waves driven by gravitational force. Gravity waves are waves in the Earth and atmosphere in accordance with Newton’s theory of gravity."

Already being done to some extent by https://zenrobotics.com/ Even if I suspect that Go algorithms are not involved.
The problem is not just algorithmic (or software), looks like developing the suitable hardware is also quite difficult.

There's also a marketing demo video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?... which might be more interesting than the corporate site.

My interpretation of promote here is that as long as nuclear technology is used, it's used safely and helping the world become a better place. This is in contrast to using nuclear technology as weapons. But, focusing on just that one word is prone to mis-interpretation so better would be to study their mission a bit more, and more so what they actually do.

It's worth noting that one of their primary goals is nuclear safety, which is something a large part of their efforts are spent on.

I couldn't find a single politician in the membership list. There were 156 member states.

North American Society of Homeopaths is an (presumably) an interest group.

International Atomic Energy Agency is a regulatory and study organization, backed by UN.

Spot the difference?

It's a valid viewpoint to be sceptical as to the neutrality or effectiveness of regulatory organizations, but the intent and background is clearly different here.

Also, this shutdown period was planned already when the LHC went into operation, two years ago.. As far as I remember anyway.

This isn't due to a ridiculously low corporate tax rate in Ireland (it's 10% or more according to wikipedia, depending). The country with ridiculously low corporate tax is Cayman Islands (no corporate tax). Ireland's subsidiary pays licensing fees to the subsidiary in Cayman Islands, so that on paper the Ireland profit becomes miniscule, and thus the tax sums are low too.