Not fraud. Perjury. The cop is basically swearing that he witnessed the accused committing the act of speeding, and it is quite obvious that he did not. He lied to the court, in a round about way.

Good point. I'll make sure to cross Virginia off the vacation destination list...

I just did the math. My son is 43.75% white (UK ancestry), 6.25% Mohawk, and 50% Chinese. How would Virginia deal with him? Maybe it's a good thing we live in Canada...

Well, until we know how much space that "bunch of apps" is taking up, this is a useless argument.

Sorry, forgot where I was.

That is exactly what they did. The 32GB Surface is $100 cheaper than the the 32GB iPad, and with the touch cover they're exactly the same price.

I've had good luck with the Philips Warm White CFL bulbs. They have a colour that is almost exactly the same as incandescant (I can't tell the difference by looking at them) and they turn on to full brightness instantly. Literally a small fraction of a second, with no flickering at all.

What you just wrote has absolutely no basis in law in any jurisdiction of Canada or USA that I've ever heard of.

Right back at ya!

Who said there was someone behind you?

And if there was... it is also technically illegal to pass on the right. So if he wants to legally get past you, he has to wait for you to move over.

From Wikipedia:
"A popular myth is that QWERTY was designed to "slow down" typists though this is incorrect – it was designed to prevent jams while typing at speed, allowing typists to type faster."

That is irrelevant to the conversation. I'm not trying to argue the relative merits of different laws. Armed robbery is a bigger hazard than speeding, does that make speeding irrelevant?

All I'm saying is that in many jurisdictions around the world, this law is on the books. If you don't think breaking this law is a big deal, that's fine, you're allowed to have an opinion. Doesn't change the facts though. And it won't get you out of a ticket either

While that is very noble and accommodating of you, it doesn't change the fact that the person driving in the passing lane is breaking the law. If they are not in the process of overtaking another vehicle, they should not be in the passing lane.

No, wrong, that can't be argued. If there are no other cars on the road, or even if the lane to your right is empty, you are not passing, and you must by law move to the right. Your speed is completely irrelevant to this particular law.

You have to be overtaking another vehicle to occupy that lane. That's the only thing that matters.

I hope you're not saying that the AC is correct. It is actually a legal requirement that you must not travel in the passing lane if you are not actively passing someone. Going the speed limit is irrelevant. If there is room to move out of the passing lane, you are legally required to do so, and you can get a ticket if you don't. Unfortunately, such tickets are fairly rare.