Not sure if you're intentionally trying to be obtuse or missing the point due to the slightly complex wording.
Half (6) of the 12 day care facilities are below the state average.
What the source is trying to say is that considering silicon valley is an ultra-modern place, they would expect most (if not all) day care facilities to be above state average.

I never said that I'm using 4k.
After your response I think my original comment might make me look like a resolution whore.
My point was NOT that the card should be labeled low end because of 4k. Rather, it should be labeled high end.
I play at 1920x1080 resolution. So from my perspective, the card is high end.
It's just that cards get labeled based on series (like Nvidia x60 series is mid-end) which is primarily based on price.
When there are graphics cards available from $30-3000, the low, mid and high end will be different based on a person's usage and perspective.

My point was that for vast majority of people (according to Steam Hardware survey: > 98%) who would be gaming at 1920x1080 or less, this card would be high end.
(Note to self: Well done on conveying exactly opposite of what you are trying to say without using sarcasm, negation or typos)

I think the 'range' depends on what resolution you are playing at..
For 3840x2160 - Low end
For 2560x1440 - 'Midrange'
For 1920x1080 - High end

I think what the article is trying to say is that in general we (as consumers) will be at loss even if we want just few extras but not everything.

So say probably you don't want to pay $60 for cable. They may provide a cheap option for $20 which includes free and local channels. However (say in your case) when you add 'true' science channels + HBO + AMC + Showtime (or similar), you'll reach $50 or so. So you'll pay a very similar price losing out 100+ channels. You may not want those channels but those channels are handy when you have friends/relatives (w/kids) over. Primarily the argument is that we won't gain much (if anything).

From the article: "People who once could not afford to visit family members across the country may now be able to find bare-bone tickets within reach."
I think these changes are targeted to cord cutters more than current cable customers. I'm a cord cutter but recently I moved to Comcast's Internet+HBO (includes free and local channels) plan. I'm missing few channels like Comedy Central but I'm ok with streaming from www.comedycentral.com

I would like to believe you. I really really want to but what's the guarantee?
The adoption of Win 8.x is still quite low. After Steam announced SteamOS, we have seen few companies port their gaming engine to Linux and some hardware manufacturers have started giving some standing to Linux (not saying equal to Windows). Microsoft is at a low right now and 'embracing' seems like a business need more than just a change of heart. How do you know that it won't 'extinguish' cross platform support when it defeats the competitive options.
This is like we had a bad tyrant and we suffered tremendously under this tyrant and it took a DoJ anti-trust lawsuit and a very long amount of time to see meaningful competition in this space again. Now the tyrant is back saying pretty please.
My reply is simple: Fool me once...

Linux noobs generally do NOT use Debian.
They start with ubuntu or some of it's derivative like Mint.
On a personal note, I use Linux Mint as my primary OS and recommend it to any noob who asks me on how to start using Linux. I have no qualms admitting myself as a Linux noob :)

We Are the Linux fanboys.
You Will be Assimilated.
Resistance is Futile.

- Linux fanboy :)

Ok to reject the Comcast/TWC merger now...

Didn't say that there is no exposure at all. Just wanted to say that there are bigger targets out there compared to an iphone.

How much work do you do on an iphone that would be a threat to national security?
I thought something like Windows makes more sense.

How so?
In our cities today, this is already true. There are areas where prices are very high and poorer people can't afford to buy houses there. The same thing would apply for this 'dome city' too.

The article says "may be free to wander through by day, but they will surely find no residence there"; just like our current divide of richer areas vs poorer areas.

Then the article says "It won't be long before there will be those who will be desperate to get inside; and it means an authority will be established to decide who can, and who can't."
Why do you need that? Free market economy will control the prices of housing in the dome just like our current housing rates as per school district lines or proximity to other valuable services.

I don't see how this is any different from our current rich/poor housing divide.

Makes me wonder if Seiki can afford to give 65" 4k TV for $1059, (Deal at Amazon right now: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obi...) why can't the other big name brands (Sony/LG/Samsung) have 65" 4k TV sets at even double that price (say $2100).