If they're going to insist on a new keyboard key, isn't it time they gave us an "any" key?

Better for what? Bragging rights?

Sorry, but if it's designed to be blown when a large enough current passes through it, it's a fuse. Whether it protects anything or not is irrelevant.

Source?
Aw, of course. There isn't one, is there?

As a card-carrying libtard, I'd have marked this as funny.

Damn. Where are mod points when you need them?

Should we get off your lawn?

"Carlos O'Donnell, a senior software engineer at Red Hat, recommended avoiding jokes altogether"

If only he'd said that when Red Hat came up with systemd ...

Oh, fsck, no. Please. She still hasn't learned that she was as popular as a bout of Ebola last time, and the the only reason she won the popular vote is that she wasn't Trump.
Please, please let someone else run this time, otherwise we'll be stuck with another GOP fsckwit.

Mention of that frequency range is what attracted me to this article. Long, long ago (well, 30+ years) I was a satellite communications guy posted to a remote earth station, so I'm well aware of the dangers of using this band for anything but satellite comms.
Why on earth does the FCC want to do this? Or have the major users given up C-band?

Putting JavaScript in ads causes too many problems, from drive-by malware to this (and many other things too). And it leads to annoying ads, like those pop-ups that never leave your field of view.

Yes, yes, I know it's because advertisers want to draw attention to their product. However, I suspect that many people would object less to ads if they weren't so annoying: compare to advertisements in (print) newspapers, who seem to have got along just fine without ads in -- what? -- several centuries so far?

If we banned JavaScript in ads, malware authors would have a lot more difficult task pushing their crap.

(Have to admit: only half-serious here, but still ...)

What if it were someone else's nuclear power plant?

You're talking about systemd, aren't you?