Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Not entirely (Score 1) 241

You're half right. When I started my Ph. D. in Chemistry in 1993, there was no more formal language requirement, and for a number of years prior to that grad students had to show working proficiency in one of (IIRC) German, Russian, French, or Japanese.

OTOH, there are still German chemistry journals. Angewandte Chemie publishes in both German and English, or did last time I bothered to look at the non-international version. AFAIK, several other journals such as Zeitschrift Naturforschung are still published. I think some of the journals require that the abstract appear in both languages.

Of course, many of our German colleagues speak English as well as if not better than most Americans speak English.

Comment Re:Wasted helium (Score 1) 290

Our current large-ish contract price for liquid helium is about $12/L, and Praxair has been adding a nice $.50/L "contingency" fee to all orders for the past year or so. Cheapest I know of anyone getting it for is about $10/L, I know of places paying as much as $300/liter, it really depends on your contract (or lack thereof), location, usage, etc. There is regular talk of rationing, and for the most part new customers can't get liquid helium period. There's only one grade of liquid helium, BTW. Gas comes in several grades but the price isn't that different except at the really low end (balloon grade which is only about 70-80%) and really high end (99.9999+%).

Helium recapture is becoming more common, and a lot of newer imagers have re-liquefaction systems built it, but for older instruments it really only makes financial sense to recover if you use a lot. I've priced recovery systems for the NMR facility I work in and if we could capture nearly all of the ~3000 L/year that we put into our magnets I calculated a ROI period of about 12 years when helium cost more like $10/L. That excluded costs for routine maintenance of the recovery equipment, BTW.

Grim Reefer's 1500-3000 L is about right for how much it takes to cool down and energize a new system. After that, I think 20-60 L/year is about right for maintaining a newer system with built in recovery, a smaller bore imager I helped fill for about a decade used about 500 L/year.

Comment Re:Problem: 9th CIRCUS (Score 1) 168

One AC already posted part of the answer. The Supreme Court is the only court than can overturn the federal circuit courts. They get to decide which cases they hear, which are pretty limited in number. So they usually only choose to take cases that are likely to be overturned, are particularly controversial, or are of questionable Constitutionality. If it's fairly clear that they'll agree with the lower court, they refuse to hear the appeal and the lower ruling stands (and therefore doesn't bring down the overturn rate). They can also ask the lower court to reconsider a case, possibly in light of some other ruling, before deciding to hear it.

TL;DR version: the Supreme Court generally only hears cases with a reasonable chance of being overturned, the overturn rate is high.

Comment Re: "... exclusive to Verizon..." (Score 1) 52

We mostly do. But assume the phone costs $480 to make the math easier and you can:

  1. Buy from VZ and pay over 24 months, adds exactly $20/month to the bill
  2. Put on plastic, then either pay the entire $480 at the end of the first month OR pay usurious interest until you've paid it off. It will take way longer than 2 years to pay off if you only pay $20/month toward the credit card bill.

Comment Re:For what use? (Score 1) 364

I also don't usually need more than about 8 GB, but there are many ways the extra RAM could be useful,. Others have already mentioned CAD or VMs, AR/VR, better/faster caching, etc. I also don't doubt people will come up with new and clever ways to exploit the extra memory.

My real concern with this, though, is that in the next year or two we'll wind up with software like Windows 11, Office 2021, and the next versions of Adobe CC applications being released and requiring so much memory that 32 GB will quickly become the minimum needed for a smoothly functioning PC. It's happened over and over and I have no reason to believe things will be different this time around.

Personally, I'd love to see devs and beta testers work on 5-10 year old hardware (feel free to compile or render on a server) so they know how their stuff will behave on what "normal" users have. It'll never happen.

Submission + - Declaration of Independence Declared Anti-Trump Propoganda 1

chubs writes: NPR's Morning Edition has been reading the Declaration of Independence aloud every Independence Day for the last 29 years. This year, they extended that tradition to twitter and tweeted out the lines of the declaration. Some on twitter called it spam, and several supporters of President Trump called it anti-Trump propoganda, failing to realize that the grievances being aired were in reference to King George, not Donald Trump.

Comment Re:Yes, vets deserve great healthcare (Score 1) 350

I might use stronger language than merely despicable. But apparently the law to get a permit in Iowa allows any local "competitors" to challenge your application on just about any grounds. The story is almost certainly up on kcrg.com (local ABC affiliate) and/or thegazette.com (their partner newspaper).

Comment Re:Yes, vets deserve great healthcare (Score 2) 350

I'm not sure where exactly the line should be drawn, but almost every other country in the world spends SIGNIFICANTLY less on healthcare and has better overall outcomes *queue unsubstantiated anecdotes about long waits for emergency care*

I would think though that moving the line somewhere so that health is more important than profits...

As a small example, last night on the local news there was a story about someone trying to open a discount surgical clinic, his permit has been denied by the state at least 4 times, at least partially on grounds that if he opens it won't be profitable for the local hospitals to do that surgery any more. I wish I was kidding.

Submission + - Ask Slashdot: Advice for a Yahoo! mail refugee

ma1wrbu5tr writes: Very shortly after the announcement of Verizon's acquisition of Yahoo, two things happened that caught my attention. First, I was sent an email that basically said "these are our new Terms of Service and if you don't agree to them, you have until June 8th to close your account". Subsequently, I noticed that when working in my mailbox via the browser, I kept seeing messages in the status bar saying "uploading..." and "upload complete". I understand that Y! has started advertising heavily in the webmail app but I find these "uploads" disturbing. I've since broken out a pop client and have downloaded 15 years worth of mail and am going through to ensure there are no other online accounts tied to that address. My question to slashdotters is this: "What paid or free secure email service do you recommend as a replacement and why?" I'm on the hunt for an email service that supports encryption, has a good Privacy Policy, and doesn't have a history of breaches or allowing snooping.

Comment Re:Copyright gets no respect in this country (Score 1) 195

For the author, copyright is not temporary, and has never been. It is always life + X years.

IIRC, the original period of copyright in the US was 14 years, which was later allowed to be renewed once. It stayed that way for some time. Then the increasing lengths started. There were a few increases beyond that, I think up to about 50 years total which is probably too long but still semi-sane. Once the copyright on Steamboat Willie was about to expire, the Sonny Bono copyright act came along and extended that signifcantly, and it's been extended a couple more times since.

The Constitutional purpose of copyright is to "promote progress in the useful arts and sciences" by protecting things for a "limited time". Sadly, the courts have ruled more than once that life of the author plus 70 years counts as limited, and I wouldn't be surprised if they applied the same standard to "forever minus a day".

Submission + - Breitbart misrepresents climate research from 58 scientific papers (climatefeedback.org)

dywolf writes: From Climatefeedback: In an article for Breitbart, author James Delingpole claims to provide 58 scientific papers published in 2017 that show global warming to be “a myth”. This claim is sourced entirely from a list on a blog called “No Tricks Zone”. Delingpole claims “comfort” in “know[ing] that ‘the science’ is on our side”, but he can only do so by fundamentally misrepresenting the scientists’ research.

Climate Feedback reached out to authors of the scientific studies in the list of 58 papers that Delingpole claims “corroborate, independently and rigorously” his view that “‘man-made global warming’ just isn’t a thing.”

So far, 29 scientists have responded to our request for comment, and all 29 have replied “No” to the question, “Do you agree with the Breitbart article that your study provides evidence against modern climate change caused by human activities?”

Said Nathan Steiger, Postdoctoral Fellow, Columbia University: "The blog post maliciously tampered with figures from my paper, removing lines from the figures. My paper is just not relevant to the arguments about global warming."

Slashdot Top Deals

Good day to avoid cops. Crawl to work.

Working...