That makes sense. It's talking about just the chatbot, which was trained on plain text.

Image and video generators are the ones with petabyte grade training sets.

Should've been Florida man.

Onion went politically correct about five years ago and all but died as a result. "Safe edgy" competes with mainstream, and that just doesn't work for Onion's niche.

If you still want anglo edgy counterculture predicting future insanity, Babylon Bee is probably the closest thing you'll get to Onion from over a decade ago. But it has all the weird hang ups of US Christians, since it's a Christian site. So not quite the same thing.

Literally everything else. Bing is meh but works. Yandex post split into the Dutch company for the West and Russian for the East has been better than google on the Western side. Even Ecosia doesn't suck all that bad any more.

It's much worse than that. Google's main strategy has somewhat recently become to look into your search (including all the data they have on you), see what ad they can pitch to you based on that search and deliver that instead of a search result.

And for a while you used to be able to just go to page 3 or so and still find that search result you wanted. Nowadays, they don't even let you see the "billions of results" they quote. They just give you a few pages of mostly pitching things to you, and that's that.

I find it hilarious how accurate my description of your behaviour was. Yup, accusations of looking into primary sources over spin doctors being a "conspiracy theory" immediately follow.

For a moment, you made me entertain trying to get you to also state that this is a threat to our democracy. That's usually the next mantra in your cult after the conspiracy theory one. But honestly, I just can't be bothered. If looking into primary sources is "suspect" and "a conspiracy theory", so be it. It's not like I'm going to convince a man of faith over the internet that his God is not real.

I have no specialist skills to reverse engineer the specific knowledge of software that he used from a sound clip. That would require extreme level of knowledge in field of generative audio models and comprehensive data analysis.

I'm not sure how that's relevant which specific generative model he used either. There are quite a few that are open to all.

This is my point. You don't care about what happened. If you did, you'd go to readily available primary sources.

Instead you decided to attack me for referencing primary sources, because spin doctors you're comfortable with didn't mention them. Essentially, your attack on me is an act of maintenance of your ideological bubble against the reality that is more than willing to stare you in the face. It just takes one search on the subject and going on from there.

But you're telling me, straight up with full honesty that you won't do that, because that is something that is associated with primordial horror and death for you. It's a reaction of a cultist sensing something that might damage his faith.

You can take the horse to the water. You can't make it drink. One look at the man's social media accounts and then listening to the AI generated speech will tell you exactly how BLM features into it. It's literally one search away. From where you'll probably quickly run into the local far left militant cells perpetrator successfully mobilized appealing to black lives mattering to attack the white principal.

But you won't do it. Because "ghosts", the feature of a primordial death and destruction awaits should you do that.

There was a massive increase in demand for cloud services as well, because of all of the "masses working from home" novelty. So there would be a lot of demand for enterprise as well.

I suspect this is more of it being a long lead product. Or the story is just generally inaccurate on everything, since it also seems to imply that entire chatGPT training data set could fit on two hard drives, and yet that is somehow causing a shortage of hard drives.

I suspect they got the wrong prefix, and it's actually petabytes.

There's about billion and a half of them, give or take a US worth of people. So while they have a lot LESS money, they have SOME money. And there's a whole lot more of them than Americans.

Have you considered taking a look at accuser's social media profiles, instead of wondering why people who support BLM are being protective of a known BLM activist?

And then cross reference that with the contents of AI generated speeches to reach the self evident conclusion? Remember, you don't have to go to the spin doctors. You can just go to primary sources.

I do not accept your redefinition of words. Gender and sex are synonyms, as they have been for as long as I have been alive.

Not so. There are generally widely accepted things that do not lie in this realm. For example, threats and fighting words, defamation and libel.

Here was an obvious example of the latter half.

If you read the actual merits of the case, teacher was a far left nutjob who tried to get central left position holding principal fired in the name of the ideological disagreement.

I.e. this isn't a conflict between teacher and principal. This is a conflict within US left wing political movement, where progressive far left is trying to finalize subversion of many institutions, where older people still hold old school liberal politics in spite of younger rank and file being far left.

It's a power struggle between the last vestiges of left wing liberalism and the progressivism laying siege to them.