Comment Re:"protecting against misinformation" - Laughable (Score 1) 188
Wikipedia's community is awful. It's a perfect example of a community that has become utterly defensive about it's flaws. I was a pretty prolific editor, too, before I decided to leave.
My particular beef with Wikipedia is it's massive biases (particularly in respect to geography and gender). The average wikipedian is a middle-aged anglophone male from an upper middle class background and living in the US or Western Europe. They have very clear interests and disinterests, and anything that doesn't interest them will be deleted without hesitation or consideration. Discussion on the point usually just results in pointing to notability guidelines or long-established precedent for which there is no interest in changing.
Worse, conversation is adversarial in a way that can barely be believed. I was accused of being "drunk" for refusing to agree with an admin, and because I was posting on, I think, Thanksgiving (I think there's an assumption, perhaps, that Americans get drunk on Thanksgiving and troll on wikipedia - I'm not American so...).