Where in the Constitution does it say that private companies have to print the vile lies of ANYONE?

It is fallacious to reference the Constitution, it is irrelevant in this case.

I love how you post a sensible, moderate perspective, but the Slashdot system just mods you down to zero because you are a "LIBWAL" and all the people who support you do not even get a say in voting for you. Slashdot has been slowly losing numbers for years now, and this is why.

Are you a moderate liberal/progressive? Well, you are simply not welcome on Slashdot. Which is pathetic.

What a ridiculous and naive perspective. Cheats are the bane of every single online game.

People are out LOOKING for companies who have good anti-cheat solutions, because we like to game. We are willing to jump through all kind of hoops because cheats are so common.

Lol I love how on topic and accurate you are, and also how you have been down-modded for 'off topic'.

Pretty standard neo-con fare for Slashdot these days. This place is overrun by outrage nutbag whining conservatives blathering about how nutty and "dangerous" liberals and the "youth of today" are.

Lol smh. The length and severity of lockdown is DIRECTLY related to competency in handling the virus.

So your question is a straw man. Australia and New Zealand will suffer less of an economic downturn than USA, because their leaders handled the pandemic in a more competent manner. Less infection rates, less mortality, greater complicity in requisite social behaviours. So yeah - a more competent leader would have reduced the economic impact of the pandemic on the USA.

It is quite elementary when you are not deluded about Trump's competency.

...corporations are still people.

Nope it's COVID

Erm Trump's approval rating is not at "record-high".

Mid-40's gold nova here.

Git gud kid.

Only in neo-con fever dreams.

"Someone"? Just...anybody? I'm pretty sure the 'mistakes' you refer to are only mistakes depending on the training of the person finding the mistakes. No scientific training IN THE SPECIFIC FIELD IN QUESTION?

Then no one cares about the 'mistakes' you find, because you do not know what you are talking about. Peer-review is INDISPENSABLE to scientific progress. Period.

If you disagree, that is because you are not in the sciences and do not understand it. If you think journals like Nature and the journals I regularly reference in my papers have "no value in terms of validation", then you not only have no scientific training - you do not even understand the basis of science itself. So shush.

Off course it is clear to you. You do not support the idea of personal property and the right of craftsperson to OWN THE WORK THEY DID.

"Someone made a clause so YOU LOSE SUCKER"

smh

Cue angry conservatives focusing on her chosen subject matter rather than the ruling, or using the subject matter to justify the ruling.

Yeah posting photographs online does not grant corporations commercial use of your private work.

-A non-outraged straight white male.

lol you think people who write these studies do not understand the incredibly basic points you just made? Allowing for such confounding factors is at the very foundation of such research. smh. This is Harvard, genius.

Funny I didn't know slaves had such high literacy rates.

Go take a long walk off a short pier, propagandist.