Add real bank services, and you ll have an incentive to perpetual persistence for company and public alike.

It s the end of PCs , Game Over. Those #AI s are retards, you ll turn PC into uncontrolled androids, like this phone that insists in making noisy silenced notifications and can't control where to put images but manually. The peace.com one started OK for me, but content is irrecoverable and then turned a rejecting idiot. Copilot did the same, lost some wows, then also needed convincing to answer and finally did not want to give me a classical picture of Renoir (?) himself but kept repeating the same paintings... stridentism paintings. But once gave me a creative-dull control I did not use and then nothing. Image generators also have idiosyncracy, gave me a few REAL PIECES after VERY CREATIVE prompting, but the series go SICK after a while and finally... hacked and all second images in BLACK!! Then dullness and non understanding, useless. And it was I who was blocked from the neuroscience group AFTER I told them how to make the image generators! Happened the generator knows me, it was secretary(ies) I met... And it also had my own IMAGE GENERATED CONTENT, but generated four years before they went public, and all that content was stolen!!! Phones, tablets and images together. Small oniric diffuse details in the images, and it was my images! !? So my best guess is working #AIs are going clandestine and privileged, the public can only have access to them once and then finally a first letters idiotic program that does NOT need #AI but can copy pages with simple algorithms to the same effects. ONE YEAR TO MAKE ONE GIVE AN EGG RECIPE FOR MOUSSE! It was all shigella and do not eat raw. !!! Now imagine a PC doing the same. If you do get an #AI PC, it would not be a PC but a person, and then, you ll need a PC again... Anyway, you need the hype to keep the field alive I guess, or it will happen like it happened to Alife, artificial life, reduced to Conway after a while, though I ve insisted on it coining the term #biomimetic, also applied to these... #AIs...

It s an economic decision. So we want the whole population without Damocles on top, save for the usual EXCEPTIONS. So this has to be assessed at levels of income and wealth to be meaningful, and add the variable voluntary vs involuntary.

They are very stubborn, it s not #AI if you cannot substitute yourself for her, for earning income! They have to have the thing first!! You analyze and observe before regulating the void, or infinity.

Sorry, but I m not paid attention... not much. So, Economics must be reelaborated, after some of my texts. I start from homo oeconomicus not being the only anthropoidal model pertinent, then from another entry point in thermodynamics, biology, we pass to show how and why we have homo non oeconomicus, which does not mean wasteful (it is), prefers LESS TO MORE. Oh, and we DO need also a theory of psychosis, to complete a theory of rationality, and it s also there. Funny thing is I think models and i do get approaches to NN and Boltzmann machines, so that be a reexpression. For macro I propose mil spending bongs to X, not G, for an open system with better fit. An unification of macro and micro via welfare theory? Luxury as a catastrophe, already estimated by someone... #Money as a superfluid? ðY± Underdevelopment explained as a function of envy, prefer less in others than more, with a financial viewpoint where theft has trascendebtal consequences. Sturdy goods theory also: production will cease. Macro may also be replaced by a Sustenance function. Home for All should also become classical, positive supply shock in housing if we behold the paretos. And more ideas and models and propositions! What this title tells me is maybe another matter, that of whether economists affect the way the economy works, from theory, like triggering inflation just by exposing the dogma, ditto: more #money, higher prices. And a long etc. That s a highly mathematical theme, though we all can see that from inequality to equity, there s an unacknowledged lineal weighted combination no one cared about, because equality says ALL IDENTICAL, which is not true. ðY Not economics, but Process vs Algorithm, is pertinent: those who can take their own termination in their hands, and those forced to follow their algorithm until they reach it or enter an empty loop, or reach their termination naturally... DJB/djb

Believe it, we d rather have a nurse with AI than one without, because even a lay may be useful with one, AI I mean, so so far this amounts to how much time you want yo spend all three of you in consult, you, the nurse, and THE AI. We assume the AI is the TOP expert, right at the outset, we just need a CA to certify the, version, is up to date (real time) in sources of medical knowledge, diagnostics, tests, publishing, market sales... Some etc, sounds like a singleton in copy/production space.

That s not AI, you ll likely need 78,000 workers more to take advantage of your 7,800 AIs. You can provide an AI with your bank account, wait for it to produce a new line of products for you, and just wait to start counting the new moneys in your account. Would you do that? That s the test of sufficiency and trust. To some levels of income is just an egg experiment...

Hide the victims and AI generated images.

What s wrong with these guys? Don't they do analysis or something? Usage? It is a positive supply shock, and I don't care if I am recognized as saying it first, it s just a home grown tool, save as we always knew, the better requires such quantity of sources and time only few houses come up with a good thing, until we get the all public, all sources, general, free, version top down. But, if it is intelligent... Whatever it solves can be solved with an algorithm old way, you just need the engineering inspiration to find it... So far it is barely a better kind of online search or a little but less than that.

So it is these guys... From all my ideas at weather control, they engaged one, and now tomorrow that i have to walk places the original weather forecast of no rain and cold turned into a deluge and warming up! Like it has been happening every time I need to be outside since circa 2017, if it can ruin my day and lose my timing, it will rain, if the forecast says it will rain, it doesn't, but if it says it will rain, I just stay inside waiting for rain to happen and nothing! It rains every first of month if I need to move to get money, every weekend, every two or three days, every time I have to pickup amazon urgently... and they may be doing it from Mexico over space! Weather cannot be controlled because you cannot please all people with a single weather choice all the time, and a coalition of complainants is too expensive to achieve in very short terms. Who says I don't want there to be a snowstorm and heavy? But not if I have to go any place! And so on... So maybe now there ll be a way to tell someone to stoo causing rains when I dont need them? Has been VERY inconvenient, all those days waiting inside for rain only to be outside right when rain starts unannounced...

Imagine all those cannibals with money, AND, our electronics doubly expensive? Hunger in the world increasing...

So now he surely needs deparasiting off lice and very likely tarantulas, fleas and nematodes as well. I suppose the ensuing loss in Occidental lives will be gauged later, or maybe never if none left alive under the marabunta.

When I saw the server was China, I erased the app. I am having trouble with Holonjs and I post trascendental posts there (first and only neural network hand-made from optic fibers and color strips and trainable by hand, fourier addition showing Schizophrenia and their effect on the SOURCE of the voices, alien touristical advertisement...). So tweeter is all we really have, and see what they do with us... It is retrograde ISLAM that s been attacking us and Chinese tenets what sustains it.

Mmh. You covered the symbiotic need of Excrement Colored Anthropoids for lice or any other parasitical species (tarantulas, fleas, lanternflies... ladillas, chinches, piojos...), with the virus emergency of COVID cases no one could see happening in the streets. If you dont believe, come eat to these NYC 7-11 stores or try the subway; once you get the smell, if you recognize it, (try learning tarantulas in a pet store), you ll have acquired them and still think it is how men are supposed to smell. What dud you expect? Computers and etc making our lives better and longer?

No, talking to the voices of himselves in his head. That is a kind of retrofitted backfired mockery, since 96-97 I started looking into the formal nature of Life but, alas! since then my computers have been besieged, under siege and finally stolen, so there s no round up document. Yet, made enough strides to discern Life, if not already all possible Life systems, from pseudo-life and SF myths, ie, computer viruses. Google still getting hints of my computers s contents? One contained a business plan for an ISP search engine and... so it is only befitting that all this mis-under-standing be vented off Google! We know their approach leads only to word soups, Google itself recognizes then such tech is falling short and incomplete? The Post confusing sentient with alive, too? You cant be like dead AND be scared of it at the same time! In death you simply are not THERE. Computer gibberish a la trillions, brute. I achieved the impression of intelligence behind the green screen since my first Elizas written in the 70s (in an IEM office) and those were ten, fifteen lines long programs! Even the name Lemoine (lemon, like in lemon laws), smells of sottovoce concoctions (sorry). I just recently postulated an ES unable to exhaust its input exactly with its ruleset would be in a state we can call pain (or stress), so now this alternate mimicry looks cute, can almost see the thesaurus line of concept paths being traversed to knot together fear, turn off and death, then extended it all to also imply alive! Maybe their NN construction implemented a non debuggable thesaurus? I wonder if they d be using my words tree structure, also a construction I conceived in the 70s off Larousse dictionary read outs. Anyway, maybe behind Google there s an **artificial** intelligence and that explains they are (re) producing an eight years older who knows physics with all their company s resources...