Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Intel's fab tech is years behind. They're stuck (Score 2) 49

This has happened before. Intel and AMD have competed for the top dog spot for a while now. The fact that AMD is now on top should not surprise anyone. If anything the length of period in which Intel was on top was the surprise. I am not concerned for Intel, they have the resources to go long here. AMD on the other and needs the cash. So this switch up is a good thing.

Comment Re:Costs? Regulatory issues? (Score 2, Informative) 124

Categorically No. You are wildly stating the costs of nuclear and understanding the costs of Solar and Wind with energy storage. https://www.lazard.com/perspec... Nuclear is cost competitive with coal and gas (118-190 $/kwh vs 150-199 and 66-152 $/kwh) . While the energy storage costs alone would be triple the cost of either of those three options for Utility scale solar or wind($380-$895/kwh). https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy19...
Businesses

Hackers Are Exploiting a 5-Alarm Bug In Networking Equipment (wired.com) 32

Andy Greenberg writes via Wired: Late last week, government agencies, including the United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team and Cyber Command, sounded the alarm about a particularly nasty vulnerability in a line of BIG-IP products sold by F5. The agencies recommended security professionals immediately implement a patch to protect the devices from hacking techniques that could fully take control of the networking equipment, offering access to all the traffic they touch and a foothold for deeper exploitation of any corporate network that uses them. Now some security companies say they're already seeing the F5 vulnerability being exploited in the wildâ"and they caution that any organization that didn't patch its F5 equipment over the weekend is already too late.

The F5 vulnerability, first discovered and disclosed to F5 by cybersecurity firm Positive Technologies, affects a series of so-called BIG-IP devices that act as load balancers within large enterprise networks, distributing traffic to different servers that host applications or websites. Positive Technologies found a so-called directory traversal bug in the web-based management interface for those BIG-IP devices, allowing anyone who can connect to them to access information they're not intended to. That vulnerability was exacerbated by another bug that allows an attacker to run a "shell" on the devices that essentially lets a hacker run any code on them that they choose. The result is that anyone who can find an internet-exposed, unpatched BIG-IP device can intercept and mess with any of the traffic it touches. Hackers could, for instance, intercept and redirect transactions made through a bank's website, or steal users' credentials. They could also use the hacked device as a hop point to try to compromise other devices on the network. Since BIG-IP devices have the ability to decrypt traffic bound for web servers, an attacker could even use the bug to steal the encryption keys that guarantee the security of an organization's HTTPS traffic with users, warns Kevin Gennuso, a cybersecurity practitioner for a major American retailer.
While only a small minority of F5 BIG-IP devices are directly exploitable, Positive Technologies says that still includes 8,000 devices worldwide. "About 40 percent of those are in the U.S., along with 16 percent in China and single-digit percentages in other countries around the globe," reports Wired.

"Owners of those devices have had since June 30, when F5 first revealed the bug along with its patch, to update," adds Wired. "But many may not have immediately realized the seriousness of the vulnerability. Others may have been hesitant to take their load balancing equipment offline to implement an untested patch, points out Gennuso, for fear that critical services might go down, which would further delay a fix."

Comment Re:Disband the DEA (Score 1) 25

Oxycontin and fentanyl are hard drugs. I am not sure why you would think they were not included in that label. The DEA as currently architected does not deal with street level usage (could be wrong here.) And bringing guns to violence to bare against illegal traffickers of these substances is more than justified. As an aside, just using a proxy for actual impact opioids kill around 40,000 while alcohol kills 80,000. I don't see why you could reasonably say that alcohol is "by far" more damaging. We could spend all day arguing the details, but they are at least on the same playing field.

Comment Re:Disband the DEA (Score 3, Insightful) 25

The DEA can only do so much. There IS good reason for fight crack, opioids, and various other HARD drugs. Unfortunately due to outside AND internal politics they seem to fight weed etc just as hard, if not harder, than things which are actually killing people. I'm sorry Weed, Mushrooms, LSD, Coke, and Ecstasy are NOT in the same category as Heroin, PCP, Crack, Methamphetamine etc. Pretending they are results in a wildly dangerous misappropriation of resources and the creation of cartels.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Never give in. Never give in. Never. Never. Never." -- Winston Churchill

Working...