Fraunhofer's response to free MP3 encoder writers
My eagerly awaited copy of
C'T has arrived, and in it there is a short interview with
Martin Sieler, multimedia software lead at
the Fraunhofer Institute.
The topic was Fraunhofer's demand for patent license fees on free MP3 encoders.
In it Sieler disputes that the encoders were free because the internet
sites distributing them made money on the banner advertisements. He also
discusses the newest MPEG standard
(MPEG-2 Advanced
Audio Coding -- also to be in
MPEG-4): a
refinement of the MPEG-1 layer 3 technology (MP3), it will provide even higher compression
rates for the same audio quality. As with MP3 unlicensed encoders will be
illegal, but unlike MP3
no free
decoders will be tolerated...
S: I find the ISO's current
trend of accepting standards which cannot be implemented without violating
patents worrisome. While I agree with some readers that a lot of work goes into
this type of research I disagree that the key elements are inventions: they
are discoveries about how human perception works. As a result,
an unrestricted alternative (like gzip was to pkzip) should
not only be possible, but encouraged. What do you think?
I've corrected MPEG-3 to MPEG-1 Layer 3. Thanks
manuka
for your correction. I've also corrected the "like
gzip" statement to "like gzip was to pkzip" since it
seems to be causing some confusion. Finally thanks
to Christian
who pointed out I forgot the u in Fraunhofer. Oops.
Fraunhofer's response to free MP3 encoder writers More Login
Fraunhofer's response to free MP3 encoder writers
Related Links Top of the: day, week, month.
Slashdot Top Deals