Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?
GNU is Not Unix

Should manuals be GPL'd too?

The FSF published a plea recently for the manuals documenting free-software to be placed under a GPL-like license, so that they stay up to date with the development of the programs they are supposed to document. This is a good point, but may contradict my hope that one can work full-time on free-software by living off the royaltees from its documentation. On the other hand, there are books freely available in source format that are also published. I know I buy Linux on a CD for ease of use, and a spiral bound copy of a good book is invaluable, so people would buy it. In fact I'm more likely to buy a book I have read and liked, than an unknown. So maybe it's possible to sell your cake and eat it. What do you think?
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Should manuals be GPL'd too?

Comments Filter:

"I will make no bargains with terrorist hardware." -- Peter da Silva