Canadian Phone Company Selling Porn 342
westcoaster004 writes "Telus, Canada's second-largest telecommunications carrier has started selling pornography to its cellular subscribers. The service allows subscribers with mobile browsers to purchase both photographic and video adult-oriented content from Telus, at an average of CD$4 per download. Telus decided to introduce the service after noticing that there existed a certain 'segment of the population that is interested in that content' from review of the mobile Web browsing habits of their subscribers 'on an aggregate level.' They are the first telecommunications company in Canada to offer such content. A Telus spokesman said: 'We're fairly certain that if our competitors in Canada haven't launched it, they will soon. Same in the US.'"
Reach out and touch... (Score:0, Insightful)
Coming soon to U.S.? Ha! (Score:3, Insightful)
Yeah, right, buddy. Maybe the population as a whole is a little more liberal up there in America Junior, but if AT&T, Verizon or any other U.S. cell provider even floats that idea in a meeting, the Bible-thumpers will start up the boycotts and letter-writing campaigns and raise all kinds of hell to make sure it never comes to fruition.
~Philly
What will happen (Score:2, Insightful)
when Canadians and others with porn on their mobilephones, beknownstly or unbekonwnstly illegal in the US arrive in the US and get deatained for it? It all sounds so salacious. what is an agent thinks the "performers" or "models" are not of age (even if there were) how'd you prove it quickly? I see lots of inconveneince. Leave your porn home....
Anyway, what kind of mentality do thse people have needing porn on their phones.. Can't they wait till they get back home (or office at worst).Talk about people who can't contol their urges.
Re:What really is wrong with porn? (Score:2, Insightful)
Nothing. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:What really is wrong with porn? (Score:4, Insightful)
IMHO, I find these morals good in a sense that I would prefer living in area where such good morals are upheld than in one where it isn't. It brings a sense of protection for me, my family, etc
I miss the point of the first sentence. CSI is to crime investigation as Porn is to sex. Both are fake replicas that stress quick umm.. resolution over the truth behind normal situations.
IMHO, areas of strict morality only hide the vices better. Strict morality does not generally make you a better person. For each giving and self sacraficing "moral" person there is a dozen hippocritical, hateful "moral" person. Ditto for the Immoral.
Re:Interesting Paranoia (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:What really is wrong with porn? (Score:5, Insightful)
How often have you seen someone in a porn film use a condom or say "I love you"?
Re:Interesting (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Interesting (Score:2, Insightful)
I'm not sure why people would suddenly get outraged over Telus when telecom companies like Rogers, Bell, etc. have been carrying pay-per-view pr0n channels for a few years now, and probably getting a cut of the money too. A quick scan of my Rogers digital box shows such titles as 'Natural Born Boobs 3' and 'The Anal Express' available on PPV.
No, what's outrageous is the fact that anybody would actually pay $4 to watch a pr0n clip on a tiny cell phone screen. You have to be pretty horny and desperate to pay that kind of money for something like that.
Re:Interesting Paranoia (Score:3, Insightful)
That would explain why our free to air TV is so bland and safe and not at all full of swearing and nudity. Oh wait a minute....
But seriously, aside from the Jerry Springer Opera fiasco which was an extremely organised campaign, we don't have anything like the Mary Whitehouse movement given any mainstream credibility. And the religious movements that there are react to perceived threats to their religion (the Jerry Springer Opera again...) which is as expected and don't seem to bother much with lewdity in general. Is lewdity a word? It should be.
Re:Interesting (Score:5, Insightful)
1. Don't equate pornography with sex. It isn't the same. You can be pro-sex but not pro-pornography.
2. That said, I would say that 95% of violently anti-pornography people are, at some level, anti-sex.
Re:Interesting (Score:3, Insightful)
Freedom was a nice idea, but most people prefer to live in a cage. The cage has nice, well-delineated boundaries (the walls of the cage), you know your place (inside the cage), you're protected (by the cage). As long as you can convince yourself that YOU are the free one, and that it's the rest of the world that is actually trapped outside of the cage, then it's all gravy.
Re:Interesting Paranoia (Score:3, Insightful)
Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Interesting Paranoia (Score:5, Insightful)