Can Faraday Cages Tame Wi-Fi? 145
mrraven writes "An article at TechWorld discusses the increased need for wireless network security. One possible solution to this problem is the use of building-wide Faraday cages to block the wireless signal from 'leaking'." From the article: "Small installations of RF shielding don't have to be expensive, and the basic concept of a Faraday cage can be extended to all kinds of small everyday objects. Leather wallets sandwiched with a conductive RF-shielding layer can prevent RFID scanners from reading personal information implanted in everything from RFID-enabled access control cards to some credit cards; they're widely available for as little as US$15. For those favoring a more DIY route, several Web sites have information on how to make an RFID-blocking wallet with duct tape and aluminum foil."
UK defense system (Score:5, Interesting)
Leaky (Score:5, Interesting)
Once again, it's probably better to focus on good encryption, though this is hardly much help to defeat certain on-site DOS attacks. Then again, that's what your security force is for
Sheet rock (Score:2, Interesting)
Still probably going to be rather expensive, it being a whole "chicken and egg" type of situation.
It's probably cheaper on the whole to use good wireless security and regularly test for employees opening unsecured wireless networks using some workstations with wifi cards running shell scripts looking for unsecured networks....
Re:What about windows? (Score:4, Interesting)
Not necessarily. I would imagine that some kind of transparent conductive coating could be sprayed onto the glass, and reapplied periodically. For example, my car's windshield has a conductive layer that is used as the radio antenna (it also inconveniently blocks my tollway transponder, something I did not foresee when I ordered the thing.) I'm sure that there would be plenty of window manufacturers that would be happy to sandwich a clear conductive layer in their products were there a demand for this.
Yeah, you're right it's not that hard to provide a decently secure wireless setup
We have a Faraday caged room (Score:2, Interesting)
The system works quite well, but we still get quite a bit of leakage through the two doorways (they have a copper lining as well). We can still pickup cell phone calls within 3-4 feet of the doorway (when closed), but not much more than that. However, the room is quite dead for WiFi transmission.
shielded windows and wallets (Score:3, Interesting)
This seems like its overkill - be more sensible to have some encryption and maybe a system where you have to login to get access to the web is more practical. This way you get to keep what few bars you have on the cell.
With respect to the RFID in passports or on cards, yeah you might want a Faraday cage in your wallet but I wonder how long it is before that becomes classified as suspicious behaviour. I can just see those TSA officials getting red in the face that you'd dare question their authority by using a shielded wallet and having you detained for an hour - just enough to miss your flight.
Why does it have to be a physical? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:The truth may be out there... (Score:5, Interesting)
Our office has IR tempered glass (which is quite common in "all-glass" buildings nowdays.
Stops WiFi dead in its tracks. The signal drops by 20+db when going outside the building to the point where you can no longer home in with a normal receiver. Granted, this will not help against a professional attacker, but it is more then enough against random wardriving k1dd10tz.
So if you have to chose between two buildings which are all-glass and glass windows + wall for a new office the all-glass is better as far as WiFi is concerned. Wardrivers aside, allocating channels without worrying about neighbours is quite a nice thing to have.
Re:UK defense system (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Faraday Cages will work (Score:3, Interesting)
Inadvertent Faraday Cages (Score:4, Interesting)
So yes, it does work.
why is everybody so concerned about wireless secur (Score:2, Interesting)
20 db drop is not always enough. (Score:2, Interesting)
Go past legal and at lot more than 30db can be done.
20 db drop is only good if you network stays under 20db itself. If you fit a 30db arial inside a 20 db shield you shoot self in foot. A farday setup cannot be broken by just fitting a larger arial. But it can block mobile phones. Both ways have a price.
Not just WiFi (Score:3, Interesting)