Taiwan Mobile Computing Industry Adopting Crusoe 45
plaXion writes, "California's Transmeta Corp said on Monday Taiwan's key computer manufacturing industry was already adopting one of its new chips as a de facto industry standard for new mobile 'Web pads.'" It's a New York Times story, free registration required to read.
No regristration required (Score:1)
Re:No regristration required (Score:1)
Re:I bet it'll run BeOS (Score:1)
I'm hoping that Be doesn't die due to their lousy marketing like so many other great companies. (NeXT, Commodore, Atari...)
Re:For those without a NYT account (Score:1)
To me, it looks like you're comparing the current way of getting slashdot moderators and the US gov way of doing things.
Hmm... I just don't get the connection to Transmeta's announcement.
Maybe you should go somewhere else. No one likes reading your crap. Maybe you aren't a moderator for a reason.
Re:For those without a NYT account (Score:1)
--
Re:I bet it'll run BeOS (Score:1)
--
Re:WindowsCE v Linux/Transmeta v EPOC/ARM/Palm (Score:1)
Re:I bet it'll run BeOS (Score:1)
I bet it'll run BeOS (Score:1)
Mobile Linux? (Score:1)
What about Be? (Score:1)
I think that Be and Stinger have a lot of potential in the WebPad arena and they should, by all means, not be counted down and out for the count before the real fight even begins.
As for WinCE, I don't really have much nice to say about them. The windows interface barely works for desktops.. which is was DESIGNED for. I really feel that, as an interface for a WebPad/Palmtop it will fail.
--
Re:Linux Torvalds ? (Score:1)
I guess I must have been asleep under that rock for too long.
Regards,
Rami James
--
Re:WindowsCE v Linux/Transmeta v EPOC/ARM/Palm (Score:1)
Windows CE is in a hole somewhat, grabbing at the ankles of anything it can in the vain hope of dragging them down to it's level ...
Jeez, that's a Troll ...
When can we buy a Crusoe laptop? (Score:1)
yep thats damn cool (Score:1)
WindowsCE v Linux/Transmeta v EPOC/ARM/Palm (Score:2)
It seems that the mobile devices arena has three distinct threads, MS in one corner with WindowsCE, the old boys of Psion in association with Symbian (Nokia, Ericsson et al) and the EPOC OS, and now Transmeta and Linux.
Its going to be interesting to see what happens as their currently differing market places begin to combine with the mainstream.
What are the advantages of Mobile Linux over EPOC ?
Dangling the carrot. (Score:2)
and we love it.
//Phizzy
Re:What is Taiwan?? (Score:2)
Vague, but boy do I love it (Score:2)
The Main thing I would love this Transmeta stuff for is to act like a pc that I can lug around and that communicates with my server to show me what is on the screen there. It would be great to cuddle up in the couch and watch a movie on that screen or go to class and make notes on it and then have them stored instantly on my server at home. Here on campus there is a program called Wireless Campus and I think these things would fit in nice. Espescially if you can hook it up with a Bluetooth enabled keyboard, for the things you dont like to do writing. I am really anxious to see what will be shown at CEBIT in 2 days.
build your own? (Transmeta modules?) (Score:3)
So, when will we be able to buy a Transmeta version of what Jumptec [jumptec.com] has done for AMD with their DIMM PC [jumptec.com], and what Cell Computing [cellcomputing.com] has done for Intel with their PNR [cellcomputing.com]?
I've been resisting buying Cell Computing's latest with a view to buying an equivalent Transmeta module for my own wearable [blu.org] dabblings... But I can only wait so long. :-)
What is Taiwan?? (Score:3)
Taiwan is a free capitalist country. "Taiwan" doesn't decide to do anything - individual companies do. Replace "Taiwan" with "US" and you'll see how ridiculous the quote is.
And it seems like a gross exaggeration to say that "The entire island of Taiwan is standardising on these mobile devices using Mobile Linux and Crusoe"? I doubt the "entire island of Taiwan" is standardizing on anything.
Re:WindowsCE v Linux/Transmeta v EPOC/ARM/Palm (Score:4)
It is a compact (100Kb) embeddable GUI which implements the bulk of both the Win32 and X11 APIs. That gives you a very simple port of any software from two environments. Why use WinCE, when you can recompile your apps and avoid the royalities?
I presume TM's Mobile Linux is using a cut-down Xfree86. It would be interesting to see how much of the 32Mb ROM they could free up by using a purpose-built embedded GUI. (I think Xfree86 is great, I'm just not convinced it is the optimal choice for embedded applications).