Best Content Management Systems for MediaWiki

Find and compare the best Content Management systems for MediaWiki in 2025

Use the comparison tool below to compare the top Content Management systems for MediaWiki on the market. You can filter results by user reviews, pricing, features, platform, region, support options, integrations, and more.

  • 1
    BlueSpice Reviews

    BlueSpice

    BlueSpice

    $215 per month
    Discover everything instantly and enhance your knowledge acquisition speed: BlueSpice serves as the enterprise edition of the renowned MediaWiki software, which powers Wikipedia. Utilizing BlueSpice is straightforward and aligns perfectly with the high standards required by users. It allows for the integration of user-friendly extensions that simplify the administration process. Additionally, it features an attractive design! The free version, BlueSpice free, offers an excellent entry-level solution for organizations, delivering significant value to both wiki administrators and users. In contrast, BlueSpice pro represents a crucial solution for businesses, offering extensive functionalities along with a growing array of extensions, as well as long-term support, updates, and patches. Our organization was established with the goal of adapting Wikipedia's technology and principles for corporate use. Since our inception in 2007, we have been continuously enhancing the BlueSpice knowledge management platform, which is built on the open-source foundation of MediaWiki, ensuring it meets the evolving needs of our clients. This commitment to innovation guarantees that our users always have access to the latest advancements in knowledge management.
  • 2
    Open Web Analytics Reviews

    Open Web Analytics

    Open Web Analytics

    Free
    Open Web Analytics (OWA) is a free and open-source framework for web analytics that empowers you to maintain control over how you gather and assess data regarding your websites and applications. You can operate OWA on your own domain or integrate it within your web application seamlessly. This customizable framework offers the flexibility to be tailored according to your specific needs. It supports tracking for websites built on platforms like WordPress and MediaWiki, along with monitoring administrative events. OWA provides a multitude of standard metrics, dimensions, and reports to help you understand your data better. With an extensive data access API, it facilitates integration with raw data, allowing for a deeper analysis. Furthermore, OWA is designed to comply with GDPR and various other privacy regulations, ensuring user data remains protected. Beyond the basic analytics, OWA boasts several advanced features that are often missing from other open-source solutions. You can keep an eye on your analytics through an intuitive dashboard, which allows for detailed views of individual web pages, including the pages visited before and after. Additionally, you can analyze the clickstream of anonymized user sessions, providing insights into user behavior and navigation patterns. This rich set of features makes OWA a powerful tool for anyone looking to optimize their web presence.
  • 3
    Typora Reviews
    Typora offers a fluid experience for users, serving effectively as both a writing and reading tool. It eliminates the need for a preview window, mode switcher, or any markdown syntax symbols, thereby cutting out unnecessary distractions. Instead, it features a live preview option that allows you to focus solely on your content. The software also facilitates file management with an easily accessible file tree panel and an article list panel, enabling you to organize your files according to your preferences, including integration with sync services such as Dropbox or iCloud. You can effortlessly view the outline structure of your documents in the outline panel, making navigation throughout the document quick and intuitive, as you can jump to any section with just one click. Additionally, Typora allows you to export your work to PDF complete with bookmarks. You can further enhance your productivity by importing and exporting various other formats, such as docx, OpenOffice, LaTeX, MediaWiki, and Epub. To top it off, you can track your document’s length in terms of words, characters, lines, or estimated reading time, providing you with valuable insights into your writing. This comprehensive functionality makes Typora a powerful tool for anyone involved in writing or content creation.
  • 4
    Haroopad Reviews
    Haroopad is a versatile document processor that utilizes markdown, enabling users to create documents suitable for the web. It allows for the creation of polished documents in multiple formats, such as blog entries, slides, presentations, reports, and emails. Regardless of the operating system being used, Haroopad ensures a consistent editing experience, functioning seamlessly on Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux platforms. It is compatible with various versions of these operating systems, including Ubuntu (both 32 and 64 bit), Windows 7/8, and Mac OS X. As digital sharing becomes increasingly prevalent, users can now easily incorporate content from platforms like YouTube, Twitter, Vimeo, Slideshare, Flickr, Instagram, Soundcloud, and Wikipedia into their documents. Beyond just Markdown (GFM) support, Haroopad also offers the capability to create custom extensions for personalized features. The application boasts modern themes for the editing interface, various skins for the final documents, interactive UI components, and syntax highlighting for a range of programming languages, making it a comprehensive tool for document creation. Whether for personal projects or professional tasks, Haroopad provides the flexibility and functionality needed to meet diverse document creation needs.
  • 5
    VisualEditor Reviews
    The Editing team's VisualEditor initiative strives to develop a dependable rich-text editor for MediaWiki. This editor, which can be utilized as a MediaWiki extension with the assistance of the Parsoid project for HTML+RDFa, is designed in such a way that its core functionality can operate independently of MediaWiki, Parsoid, or Node.js. Since 2020, VisualEditor has been accessible to all users on MediaWiki.org and is also available on nearly all versions of Wikipedia and Wikivoyage. For many other Wikimedia projects and languages, it functions as an optional Beta Feature for logged-in users. Although VisualEditor is accessible in certain namespaces, such as the main namespace, it is typically not available in discussion or template namespaces. The issue of declining new contributor growth is perceived as one of the most significant challenges confronting the Wikimedia movement. To address this, VisualEditor was developed to eliminate unnecessary technical barriers related to Wikimedia's editing interface, which is seen as essential for boosting the number of contributors to Wikimedia projects. By simplifying the editing process, the project aims not only to enhance user experience but also to foster a more inviting environment for potential contributors.
  • Previous
  • You're on page 1
  • Next