Best Content Management Systems for MediaWiki

Find and compare the best Content Management systems for MediaWiki in 2024

Use the comparison tool below to compare the top Content Management systems for MediaWiki on the market. You can filter results by user reviews, pricing, features, platform, region, support options, integrations, and more.

  • 1
    BlueSpice Reviews

    BlueSpice

    BlueSpice

    $215 per month
    Everything is available immediately. BlueSpice, the enterprise distribution of MediaWiki's famous Wikipedia software MediaWiki, makes it easier to update knowledge. BlueSpice works as a wiki and meets the most stringent requirements. It is simple and straightforward to use. Make your administrator's life easier by adding user-friendly extensions for MediaWiki. A beautiful design is included! BlueSpice free is a free version that can be used by businesses as an entry-level solution. It adds a functional value to wiki administrators and users. BlueSpice pro, the business-critical solution, offers comprehensive functionality, an increasing number of extensions and long-term support. Updates and patches are also available.
  • 2
    Open Web Analytics Reviews

    Open Web Analytics

    Open Web Analytics

    Free
    Open Web Analytics, a free and open-source web analysis framework, allows you to control how you analyze and instrument the use of your websites. OWA can be run under your domain or as part your web application. OWA is a web analytics framework that you can customize to suit your needs. Track WordPress- and Mediawiki-based websites as well as admin events. OWS provides a variety of standard metrics, dimensions, reports, and reports. Integration with raw data access is possible thanks to the extensive data access API. OWA supports GDRP and other privacy standards. OWA offers advanced features that are rarely found in open-source products. OWA provides many standard web analytics metrics, dimensions and reports. The dashboard allows you to monitor analytics. You can view detailed usage information for any web page, including the previous and next pages viewed. View the clickstream of anonymous user sessions.
  • 3
    Typora Reviews
    Typora allows you to enjoy a seamless experience both as a reader or writer. It eliminates the preview window and mode switcher as well as syntax symbols of markdown code and other distractions. Instead, it offers a live preview feature that allows you to focus on the content. Typora makes it easy to manage your files. It has both a file tree panel as well as an article (file list) side panel. This allows you to easily manage your files. You can organize your files however you like, and even add sync services such as Dropbox or iCloud. You can instantly see the outline structure of your documents in outline panel. This allows you to quickly navigate through the document and jump directly to any section. Bookmarks are available for export to PDF. Export or import can be done further. You can export or import more formats, such as docx, OpenOffice and LaTeX, MediaWiki, MediaWiki, and Epub. You can see how big your document is in words and characters, lines or reading minutes.
  • 4
    Haroopad Reviews
    Haroopad, a markdown-enabled document processor, allows you to create web-friendly documents. You can create professional-looking documents in many formats, including blog posts, slides and presentations, reports, emails, and reports. Haroopad offers the same editing experience on any platform. It works on all major operating systems: Windows, Mac OS X, Linux. Haroopad support (Ubuntu 32/64 bit) Windows 7/8 and Mac OS X. We are more inclined to save our documents to YouTube, Twitter, Vimeo and Slideshare, Instagram, Soundcloud and Wikipedia. These contents can now be embedded into your documents. Haroopad supports Markdown (GFM) and can also build extensions to make your own features. Haroopad supports modern themes for editing area, skins to transform documents, UI components that allow interactive experiences, and syntax highlighting in various programming languages.
  • 5
    VisualEditor Reviews
    The Editing team created the VisualEditor project to create a reliable rich text editor for MediaWiki. VisualEditor can be used as a MediaWiki extension that uses the Parsoid project for HTML+RDFa. However, its core implementation is compatible with MediaWiki, Parsoid and Node.js. The visual editor is now available to all MediaWiki.org users and almost all Wikivoyages. It is also available as an opt in Beta Feature for logged-in users on other Wikimedia languages and Wikimedia projects. VisualEditor is not available in all namespaces. It is only available in the main namespace. However, it is generally not available in discussion or template namesspaces. The single most significant challenge facing Wikimedia was the decline in new contributor growth. VisualEditor was created to remove technical obstacles that could be avoided in Wikimedia's editing interface. This is a prerequisite for increasing Wikimedia contributors.
  • Previous
  • You're on page 1
  • Next