Average Ratings 0 Ratings

Total
ease
features
design
support

No User Reviews. Be the first to provide a review:

Write a Review

Average Ratings 0 Ratings

Total
ease
features
design
support

No User Reviews. Be the first to provide a review:

Write a Review

Description

Hardware-in-the-loop simulation serves as a reliable and economical method for conducting tests on physical equipment. It is particularly well-suited for validating designs and assessing intricate systems like those found in vehicles, aircraft, missiles, satellites, rockets, and trains. Instead of testing in real-world settings, evaluations are carried out within a virtual environment. A significant portion of the testing framework is substituted with mathematical models, enabling the integration of various components into a closed-loop system. This approach results in tests that are not only repeatable and organized but also expedited and more dependable. Current hardware-in-the-loop simulation technologies include the SIMulation Workbench real-time modeling platform, which operates on the RedHawk Linux OS. With SIMulation Workbench, users benefit from an all-encompassing framework that simplifies the development and execution of real-time hardware-in-the-loop simulations. The ability to simulate in a controlled environment enhances the accuracy and efficiency of the testing process, making it an invaluable tool in modern engineering.

Description

Electromagnetic sensors are composed of two main components: a "front-end" that both generates and detects electromagnetic waves via a subsystem known as the Receiver/Exciter (REX), and a "back-end" responsible for signal and data processing, which is generally carried out through software. Each of these subsystems must be developed independently before they can be seamlessly integrated. The process of creating the complete sensor becomes increasingly complex and time-consuming due to unforeseen challenges that arise during integration testing. This complexity largely stems from the interdependencies between the subsystems that are not easily testable during their individual development phases. As a result, any necessary software updates, configuration adjustments, waveform modifications, and technology upgrades can incur significantly higher costs since they often require on-site verification with the actual front-end hardware. To mitigate these issues, the Virtual Receiver/Exciter (VREX) utilizes a simulated front-end, thus streamlining the testing and integration process. By employing a virtual model, developers can identify and address potential integration issues much earlier in the development cycle.

API Access

Has API No 

API Access

Has API No 

Screenshots View All

Screenshots View All

Integrations

VerbaFlo Yes 

Integrations

VerbaFlo No 

Pricing Details

No price information available.
Free Trial No 
Free Version No 

Pricing Details

No price information available.
Free Trial No 
Free Version No 

Deployment

Web-Based Yes 
On-Premises No 
iPhone App No 
iPad App No 
Android App No 
Windows No 
Mac No 
Linux No 
Chromebook No 

Deployment

Web-Based Yes 
On-Premises No 
iPhone App No 
iPad App No 
Android App No 
Windows No 
Mac No 
Linux No 
Chromebook No 

Customer Support

Business Hours Yes 
Live Rep (24/7) No 
Online Support Yes 

Customer Support

Business Hours No 
Live Rep (24/7) No 
Online Support No 

Types of Training

Training Docs Yes 
Webinars No 
Live Training (Online) No 
In Person No 

Types of Training

Training Docs No 
Webinars No 
Live Training (Online) No 
In Person No 

Vendor Details

Company Name

Concurrent Real-Time

Founded

1966

Country

United States

Website

concurrent-rt.com/products/software/simulation-workbench/

Vendor Details

Company Name

FishEye

Website

fisheye.net/products/vrex/

Product Features

Simulation

1D Simulation No 
3D Modeling No 
3D Simulation No 
Agent-Based Modeling No 
Continuous Modeling No 
Design Analysis No 
Direct Manipulation No 
Discrete Event Modeling No 
Dynamic Modeling No 
Graphical Modeling No 
Industry Specific Database No 
Monte Carlo Simulation No 
Motion Modeling No 
Presentation Tools No 
Stochastic Modeling No 
Turbulence Modeling No 

Product Features

Simulation

1D Simulation No 
3D Modeling Yes 
3D Simulation No 
Agent-Based Modeling Yes 
Continuous Modeling No 
Design Analysis No 
Direct Manipulation No 
Discrete Event Modeling No 
Dynamic Modeling No 
Graphical Modeling No 
Industry Specific Database Yes 
Monte Carlo Simulation No 
Motion Modeling No 
Presentation Tools Yes 
Stochastic Modeling No 
Turbulence Modeling Yes 

Alternatives

Alternatives

Simulink Reviews

Simulink

MathWorks
TPT Reviews

TPT

PIKETEC
SimulationX Reviews

SimulationX

ESI Group
RoSi Reviews

RoSi

Robotec.ai
XR SDK Reviews

XR SDK

Unity