Journal mjpaci's Journal: I've been robbed!!! 1
I was browsing around the FAQs for a particular product and read one of their entries that looked eerily similar to something I had written, somewhere on the web recently. As it turns out, the answer to the question in the FAQ was almost a direct copy/paste of an answer I posted in their on-line forums on October 28, 2004. I am pissed. I've already sent them an e-mail asking them if it was their practice to pilfer people's work without citing the original author. Had they taken the concepts of what I wrote, which isn't rocket science, and re-stated it in their own language, I wouldn't care so much. However, THE DID A DRIECT COPY PASTE!!
The offending text from their website:
Open up Terminal.
At the command prompt type ifconfig -a and hit enter.
look for a line under en0 that says:
media: autoselect (100baseTX ****-duplex) status: active.
If the **** says full, disregard. If it say half, then you might have a duplex mismatch with the switch which can cause problems.
My text:
Open up Terminal.
At the command prompt type ifconfig -a and hit enter.
look for a line under en0 that says:
media: autoselect (100baseTX ****-duplex) status: active.
If the **** says full, disregard. If it say half, then you might have a duplex mismatch with the switch which can cause all kinds of weird problems when copying files.
Similarities??????
*GRUMBLE*
I am still mad (Score:2)
Even more annoying is that in their FAQ they represent this issue as being a Mac-specific problem. Bullshit. I see this everyday at work where we are 99% Windows XP. Sure, the machine will work with a duplex mis-match, but when doing anything with a large copy you will see issues