Linus Sixpack's Journal: Copyright & work For Hire

Another clear example of lobbyists doing a disservice to the population at large allowed record companies to reclassify most recording contracts as 'work for hire'. This class is meant for jobs of limited\or delegated creative input. If you say paint me a flower there or build me a ladder the 'artist' actually receives much of his\her direction from the patron. Clearly for most audio recordings this is rediculous, it places them in a lower category and allows the Record Companies to pay reduced royalties and treat the performers worse.

Yet one has to ask why does 'work for hire' receive the full protection and duration of protection under copyright law? I think it would only be appropriate that less innovative classes receive a commensurate level of protection. If I tell joe to paint a flower on the street is it fair that you can't paint a similar flower for 30 years beyond Joe's Lifetime? Obviously the street and the conditions played a huge role in inspiring the flower and you may share that self same street.

Copyright on 'work for hire' should be returned to the original view and duration of copyright as it is not a clear protection of the artist.

ls