Journal SeanAhern's Journal: The Conservative Cookie Rebellion 28
Wendy McElroy is the editor of ifeminists.com, an interesting site that deals with the question of the equality of the sexes. Ms. McElroy often does a very good job of separating the issues of gender equality and traditional "feminisism." She gets a lot of hate mail from traditional feminists because what she espouses is very different from the normal feminist party line. However, her arguments very much hold together logically.
There have been times when I disagree with her conclusions, or the procedure by which she arrives at them. But they are compelling arguments nonetheless, and I always enjoy reading her articles.
Her most recent article talks about students protesting Affirmitive Action by offering a bake sale where the price is determined by race or gender. White students must pay $1. Women $0.75. Blacks $0.25. Though obviously protected speech, these demonstrations have frequently been met with everything including violence.
Go read Wendy McElroy's article and tell me what you think.
(While I was composing this journal entry in my head, FroMan coincidentally wrote a very similar journal entry. I figured there's nothing to lose about getting the word out twice. Plus, my JE has actual links.
Great minds think alike, eh? (Score:1)
Wasn't this week's column great?
Re:Great minds think alike, eh? (Score:2)
Re:Great minds think alike, eh? (Score:1)
Yeah, there have been a number or articles on the bake sales recently. While that in itself is an interesting story, I think part of what we (or atleast I was) pointing out was Wendy McElroy, who writes for iFeminist. Her particular writeup I think was very well done and why it was worth mention today.
Re:Great minds think alike, eh? (Score:2)
In ay case, yes the article was a good read with some good info.
jason
Re:Great minds think alike, eh? (Score:2)
Well, thanks. I disagree, but thanks.
Yeah, I enjoyed the article.
Sorry, folks, for not getting more involved in the debate. I am just overwhelmed getting ready for the Christmas and New Year's holidays. Gotta wrap stuff up at work, get luggage packed, etc.
But I'm happy that the debate has continued, nonetheless!
Okay. (Score:2)
I think it's clever political speach, though I wonder if the numbers are accurate.
For the larger issue, I think that AA is too racist. A much better measure would be geographic location or tax bracket--something that isn't racist, isn't prejudicial, and is simply a "help the poor get up 'cause they don't have alumni parents to help them" program.
Re:Okay. (Score:1)
The pell grant [ed.gov] is an example which works towards helping poorer folks. There are also many merit based scholarships that people can take advantage. If all else fails there are also federal student loans that you can take advantage of. The military is always looking for recruites also and you can take advantage of GI bill. To go to college is within everyone's reach who desires and is willing to make the sacrafic
Re:Okay. (Score:2)
Yes, exactly.
But the objective of Affirmative Action is to enable disadvantaged persons to become higher educated and more productive members of society, by giving a tie-breaking boost to those of more disadvantaged material.
Rather than the current sy
Re:Okay. (Score:2)
Second, a liberal arts education is what drives civilizations forward, and if you had a brain you'd understand that. The graduates of American colleges (which are the finest in the world) are not directed towards narrow technical fields. They are taught to think. That's the goal of a liberal arts education.
If you want to crank out a robot who can't think (such as yourself) then what you need is a technical school, focu
No imagination (Score:2)
Re:No imagination (Score:2)
jason
Re:No imagination (Score:2)
What more do you exect is a journal that is not your own?
jason
Re:No imagination (Score:2)
SeanAhern is particularly hard to do my impressions for, since it seems that he rarely says the really stupid things. As a result, I have to sneak in abuse here and there, if I can.
Re:No imagination (Score:2)
(you jerk)
Re:No imagination (Score:2)
My initial reaction to the "jerk" line was a result of my annoyance of the use of the word with out substantiating comments. I saw none, so I foed, thus applying my negative "bonus" to your posts to lower them below my reading thresh-hold.
Having read a few of your recent JEs, per your request, I see that you are interested in presenting a point of view from the far left, using tactics perceived of the far right. I can only say that this is a good thing. I always want to see facts checked and opin
Re:No imagination (Score:2)
I doubt that very much. After all, one needs to look no farther than GW Bush and the White House to see what kind of spin can be put on things. The totalitarian right only wants to see facts invented and opinions squashed under their steel boot. Cm'on, that was too easy. I've even got half my brain tied behind my back.
Re:No imagination (Score:2)
Sure may be they don't want facts checked and opinions logically and thoughtfully presented... But I'm not them. Heck I am even against the sodomy laws or other laws making it illegal for same sex partners to have sex.
jason
Re:No imagination (Score:2)
I have a hard time (Score:2)
Even with AA and what not, the numbers I've seen still show pretty low rates of enrollment for minorities. So while these policies may be philosophically offensive- do they do that much damage?
So I just worry more about things that seem to be more critical.
As for my opinion of the article. I thought it was o.k. Affirmative Action is not difficult to lambast.
Re:I have a hard time (Score:1)
The idea behind affirmative action is that minorities often attend public schools in areas of the country where these schools are not up to par. Minorities are then given extra points on entrance exams and what not. What is a better fix than blatant racism? Well let me think, how about fixing the fucking schools that these liberals say are so bad? To support affirmative action is to say th
Re:I have a hard time (Score:1, Flamebait)
Last I checked, it was the conservatives who badmouth the ungodly public schools every chance they get. They even want to have vouchers to send their kids to private schools, away from the unwashed masses. Now you tell me, who is abandoning the public schools?
Re:I have a hard time (Score:2, Insightful)
Allowing minorities who are in such failing schools [so failing that some in our society actually support a racist system in accepting them to college] to go to private schools and get out of these public schools is a great idea! The ones who remain in the public schools will then be the undesirables whose parents don't care about them at all. We can then move from teaching geography to teaching how to make me some fucking french fries.
By the way, I love your work.
Re:I have a hard time (Score:2)
The entire reason why the public schools in minority areas are so bad is that they are funded by property taxes. This was clever of the conservatives - keep the future money away from the poor by tying public education to the local capital. Withou
Re:I have a hard time (Score:2)
Re:I have a hard time (Score:2)
Re:I have a hard time (Score:2)
Now pottymouth this is how the voucher program in Cleveland (model for most and one that passed SCOTUS) works. If your kid is in a school which is failing to educate them you can get a voucer to go to a charter, or private school. Now out of the 8K (mean amount) the school district
Re:I have a hard time (Score:2)
Besides, you hate the Constitution! YOU HATE IT! You told me so.
Well, that's enough impressions of Ann Coulter (if she were a liberal) for you for today. You're hogging the supply
Re:I have a hard time (Score:2)