Journal FortKnox's Journal: Renters Insurance 12
Read this story (local story about UC students in a house fire).
Moral of the story? Even in college, get RENTERS INSURANCE!
It isn't expensive, and it can be well worth it...
Moral of the story? Even in college, get RENTERS INSURANCE!
It isn't expensive, and it can be well worth it...
I got one... (Score:1)
Re:I got one... (Score:1)
Re:I got one... (Score:1)
Anyways, I don't know for you, but belongings add up quite fast. Thinking of my computer stuff alone, I easily pass the 5000Euro markup. That is two months of salary for me! Then add furniture, and about anything you need and you fast gets above 20000Euro.
Finally
Re:I got one... (Score:1)
Renter's or homeowner's insurance is only to protect your own belongings. Some people may decide that the cost of their limited belongings can be easily replaced and don't need to be insured. This might be especially true for college students. Renter's insurance only covers your own belongings, not the apartment itself (the o
Re:I got one... (Score:1)
The standard not, but I took it. I'm not crazy. College students might indeed be a special case, but honestly: look at your own belongings. If I add mine up, I know I wouldn't be able to replace all that with new stuff.
I could check my contract (don't have it handy) here and tell you what's exactly covered.
Re:I got one... (Score:2)
For renters insurance, it is assumed that your belongings cannot up and hurt other people and damage their property.
Renters insurance is for people that want to make sure that their property (excluding the apartment itself) are protected from other people (usually the cause of fire
Re:I got one... (Score:1)
I know, my bro had a DUI accident recently (only a wrecked car and a damaged tunnel *grin*), and he was *just* below that limit. Above that limit, it's bye-bye insurance. The limit is pretty low by the way: double of legal blood-alcohol. Oh, and tunnel repairs are *expensive* ;-)
drink + drive (Score:2)
Bad first analogy.
robi
Records (Score:2)
Now that is almost good enough, but you should keep
Re:Records (Score:1)
Now, I've always wondered about this - what is to p
Re:Records (Score:2)
robi