Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
United States

Journal pudge's Journal: Doe v. Reed Decided, Sort Of

The Supreme Court held, 8-1 (only Thomas dissenting) that disclosure of referendum petitions, in general, does not violate the First Amendment. The door is left open to further litigation to see if a narrower case may find in their favor.

There's seven opinions from the nine justices and I've not read them yet. I'm sure the folks behind R-71 aren't happy, but it's not over for them yet.

Cross-posted on <pudge/*>.

This discussion was created by pudge (3605) for no Foes, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Doe v. Reed Decided, Sort Of

Comments Filter:

The sooner all the animals are extinct, the sooner we'll find their money. - Ed Bluestone

Working...