Journal banky's Journal: I don't know what's worse 4
Explaining to customers "no you CANNOT have a fully ADA-accessible site, that's entirely spinny-flash things", or explaining to blind people "sorry but they specifically want the site to LOOK a certain way and, well, you know".
We've been through this TWICE already. It's painful.
And of course, for both sites, there was absolutely no evidence anyone with a screenreader had ever hit the site ONCE, but they're gov't, so, gotta do it.
One of my internships (Score:1)
HOTMAIL SUCKS. 50 ads, then the inbox link.
It was theoretically accessible though. Took 30 minutes to check a message...
The sad thing is how trivial it is to make a site easy to access.
If somebody wants spiny pretty crap, SLAP THEM. Or at least explain to them that they can make it accessible as well. The spiny flashy stuff should all be isolated from the actual content.
Last time I checked, Flash tends to be a bunch of buttons that can be tabbe
Money to be had here (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)