You might say the same of Facebook, Google+ or LinkedIn. But considering the number of services that allow these social behemoths to provide single sign support for their users, they are now some of the most critical services to secure correctly. When I reached I went log in order to post, I was presented with the option to login with Facebook, Google+ or Twitter.

The real mirrors in my house are also too perfect. Reflecting precisely what I put in front of them, rather than what I want to see. What they need is a copy-on-write file system for their source code servers, not an adaptive mirror.

This article really isn't about the OS, or lack thereof. It is about a much more seamless cloud computing experience. While the demonstration does not make much sense in real world applications, it does prove that the launch time of a new cloud computing resource can be much closer to the developer's ideal: instantaneous. In practice, a single resource could be paired with a single consumer's session, and remain allocated until their session concludes. From a management perspective within the datacenter there will be OSes involved. But developers will no longer need to concern themselves with OS images or initialization scripts, as is the case with current cloud infrastructure. I, for one, look forward to the introduction of this type of service. It will be a vast improvement over my company's current (necessary) approach, which involves booting new EC2 instances, running install and configuration scripts, fetching and launching our software, detecting that the new resource(s) is/are online, and finally, distributing tasks to the new servers. This process can take upward of 5 minutes. Not an issue given the service we provide, but less responsive than we would like, especially since we pay for the spin-up time add part of the instance hour.

This is the practice on Amazon's EC2: "Pricing is per instance-hour consumed for each instance, from the time an instance is launched until it is terminated. Each partial instance-hour consumed will be billed as a full hour." Source http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/

Good to know. But you still have the issue with log storage being a practice with online services. What is Slashdot's practice, I wonder.

And an IP address in their server logs paired with your sign on or return to the site, and simultaneous access to other sites, some of which you may actually trust with"real information." And that correlation, paired with the requirement that server logs be maintained for, what, 18+ months, ensures that you can easily be identified if that were the government's aim.

Perhaps they have been experiencing the symptoms for a long time, but couldn't figure out what was the cause.

As requested: http://imgur.com/nq4a2

There are a lot of good recommendations for how to locate duplicates. If you really plan to attempt deduplication rather than purchasing more space, there are a number of things to consider. First, don't use a tool to perform the deduplication, only to locate the duplicates. You are bound to run into a scenario you didn't anticipate. Multiple users may each maintain their own copy of identical files. If one is removed, one user no longer has access. If they are simply hard linked to the same file, modifications are applied to both. Multiple copies of the same repository from a distributed SCM (Git, Mercurial, etc.) you are going to run a vast number of false positives. There are other situations where use/ownership, and not simply structure, must be taken into consideration.

So...revolving

I imagine India's desire for mass distribution makes eBay prices irrelevant. However, if you want to work with me on producing the product you described, perhaps we could sell it to the Indian government, and retire by 2020.

Apple is giving them kick-backs to make reading list look better.

Similar to Creative's X-Fi, only more expensive.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment

Opinions on whether mice were "designed" are irrelevant to what was observed in this study. Whether the body was designed or not, there must be a reason that the NCOR1 regulator exists. Why else would the body hold back a beneficial modification, such as increased strength. I am guessing the reason for the regulator is to decrease metabolic rate. Animals might not be able to sustain themselves if they had to eat so much more frequently.