Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Note: You can take 10% off all Slashdot Deals with coupon code "slashdot10off." ×

Comment What is the purpose of regulation? (Score 0) 668

I do not believe in homeopathy. When I learned of taking 1/1000th of a 'reagent' for a
patient, I found it absurd that a three order of magnitude decrease of a substance would
somehow make it 'better'. That was back in high school, some 40 years ago.

It's bunk. But why should it be regulated? It isn't going to do harm, other than perhaps
someone not getting real medical treatment, but then again lots of people just don't go
to doctors when they should.

Regulations in the US (and a lot of Europe) have gotten out of hand. Yes, things like
homeopathy aren't useful, but they don't actively hurt either. So why have regulations?

I've long thought that the FDA should have radio and TV shows, where they describe
products that they like and dislike, and explain why. You could still buy xyzzy, but you'd
be warned that its useless, bad, or whatever.

Me, I'd listen carefully if I had reasoned pronouncements on health related items.

Comment Sad (Score 0, Troll) 649

What good will it do to kill him?

It won't bring the three dead people back, it doesn't solve anything, and while
his guilt is not in question it helps perpetuate a system that has flaws, which
cannot be corrected if an innocent person is executed.

Dzhokhar would be seen as a hero by some, as well.

I wish we would be useful if we spent just a fraction of the money used
to kill him on figuring out why folks like him get radicalized. THAT would
be useful.What good will it do to kill him?

It won't bring the three dead people back, it doesn't solve anything, and while
his guilt is not in question it helps perpetuate a system that has flaws, which
cannot be corrected if an innocent person is executed.

Dzhokhar would be seen as a hero by some, as well.

I wish we would be useful if we spent just a fraction of the money used
to kill him on figuring out why folks like him get radicalized. THAT would
be useful.

Submission + - ask slashdot: Ideas for mouse/pointer use for a person with poor motor control 1

wb8wsf writes: I recently found that a friend of mine is losing the ability to do fine-grained motor control. This means that writing, and mouse usage is going down hill.
Watching her was hard. I'd like to come up with possible solutions for her, but I'm not sure anything I know of such as a trackball, trackpoint, etc would be of much use. So far I haven't found much wandering the net.

Any pointers or ideas would be most welcome.

Comment Emergency packing (Score 4, Insightful) 331

First, triage the equipment.

You likely do not have time to pull disks from systems, so pack computers and
external drives first. Get blankets to protect things. Blankets start at the bottom
to act like a shock absorber.

Things like networking gear and wireless stuff is irrelevant compared to the
computers, and probably lighter. If you CAN, sure, save all that stuff too.

But the data comes first. Don't forget backups.

If there are computers with really really important or sensitive stuff, put
those in someones car in the backseat, again with blankets. If I seem
blanket obsessed, it's because I've found them to be available quickly
either from individuals or stores. Yes, bubble wrap or sorbathane would
be better but you aren't likely to have that stuff lying around.

Comment A wonderful trough in which to wallow (Score 1) 119

Yes, these books are useful.

            Coming from academia there are some rather obscure subjects
there, but why not read about the handling and management of
chemicals? That which is not common is still useful. I daresay
that skipping over the more "odd" things is an inditement of the
educational system. Reading that which doesn't interest you at
first is a great way to learn new things, just as reading political
views you don't agree with might broaden your ideas.

        Me, I'm going back to trough now. I only have about 50 of
them,

Comment What utter poppycock (Score 1) 660

Comments are a skill in and of themselves, which a whole lot of people never master.

      I remember two people who worked at a place where I was programming. The first
was a woman, freshly out of school who was taught that comments made the code.
So she dutifully wrote beautiful comments on the theory of what the function was
going to do, but also inline, especially for arcane things going on in an algorithm. All
nicely spaced, neat. A marvel to behold. Problem was, the code this person did
had some form of overflow condition (this was C) about every five lines, such that
I knew if I poked at the code from a higher layer I could cause problems. And did,
because I was trying to force the issue and have some kind of review go on.

      The other person in the larger group was a 20ish male, who saw human interaction
largely through the eyes of TV, and gaming / nerd get-togethers. Hardly a bad person,
he just didn't seem to have humans around him when growing up (more than a trifle
odd, even now--I met him again for the first time in 20 years; the only change was
gray hair). He was one of the people I'd go to for help when I botched things, or
wanted comments on an idea I had. His code often worked the first time run, and
I'm not talking of little 10 line routines, but larger complex functions. His comments
were about the opposite of the code, both in terms of spelling, grammar, and that
ephemeral concept of how to communicate in general. Some sentences were
better read thinking of them as RPN, and others simply defied standard logic.
Comments that did survive that minimal test of English were often spelled in
novel ways, causing euqal parts of head scratching and laughter. But the code
was great!

I offer these two examples which while extremes, are examples that poke holes
in the idea that there is a common relationship between comments and code.
Certainly some people will fit that mold, but I think that more random than not.

Comment Are there really limits? (Score 2, Insightful) 418

Though there might be a limit on how fast a computation can go, I would think that
parallel systems will boost that far beyond whatever limit there may be. If we crash
into a boundary, multiple systems--or hundreds of thousands of them--will continue
the upward trend.

      I suppose there is also the question of whether 10^16 more computing power "ought
to be enough for anybody". ;-)

Comment Re:The primary reason they release so fast (Score 1) 310

This is correct. OpenBSD can be thought of as two parts, the OS itself
and the ports/packages tree.

OpenBSD itself undergoes the most testing. This is not to say that the
packages aren't tested, because they are. But the packages--some
5000 of them--can't be tested as much as the core OS. Still, the packages
are of very high quality, and for most cases you do not have to compile
things on your own for OpenBSD.

If a port is bad, ie it isn't compiling or some such, it simply isn't included
in a release. If the port is a security horror, it isn't in the ports tree at
all.

Me, I'd rather see the OS itself get the most scrutiny, given that endless
numbers of good testers don't exist.

Statistics means never having to say you're certain.

Working...