Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:What about on the ground? (Score 1) 468

On the ground this could be easily solved in a number of ways. When a plane goes off-course where it shouldn't be, however, the last-ditch attempt to communicate by the fighters that intercept is a standard set of hand signals. That could be a problem if they can't see the pilots.

Comment: Re:Windows as point of weakness (Score 1) 468

Windows screw up the aerodynamics and force the cockpit to be at the front of the plane, making the most critical controls run the full length of the plane. If the front of the plane were smoother a flight could burn less fuel, the main cost in flying these days. If the cockpit were towards the back a lot of weight could be reduced in control lines to the wings and tail, all that's needed from the nose is wiring for a couple (critical) warning systems.

Comment: Re:Implicit ownership of the air? (Score 1) 151

by w_dragon (#46971383) Attached to: U.S. Passenger Jet Nearly Collided With Drone In March
They don't. If you're away from populated centers there is still plenty of uncontrolled airspace around. But if you're near an airport then the massive jet carrying hundreds of passengers performing the most dangerous part of the flight with proper clearance damn well has right of way over anything else.

The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent. -- Sagan

Working...