Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:Duh (Score 1) 227

by volcan0 (#34989684) Attached to: How Facebook Responded To Tunisian Hacks
Your argument was actually quite valide. The only thing I would add to it, is signing the page. Let me explain:

1. Do all the above steps
2. Hash ( and store ) the output buffer ( PHP ) before flushing it to the browser
3. When preparing the POST to send the auth to the server, have the JS include the hash of the current page

If they do not match: you know code was injected in the page.

+ - Facecrime Technology ->

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes "In late September, there was a modest gathering of law enforcement officers, military personnel, and mental health professionals in the small western New York town of Hamburg. It was totally ignored by the mainstream media, with just a reporter from the Buffalo News on hand to record the proceedings. Lucky for us"
Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:The differences are marketing and app repositor (Score 1) 338

by volcan0 (#34156564) Attached to: How Hulu, NBC, and Other Sites Block Google TV
What I really don't get is why would you allow desktop streaming but not an appliance if the idea is to protect your your IP and keep your traditional business model ( ad revenu ). It's much easier to rip a feed from a desktop / laptop / HTPC / whatever than from a locked appliance !

Nothing happens.