Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:doh. (Score 2) 382

by vik (#38801319) Attached to: Huge Freshwater Bulge In Arctic Ocean

And strangely enough, who share the same planet with YOU.

Don't be silly. The experts in the field have found the problem. You're one of the people who denies the problem, and so are not actually in a position to even bother to understand what the problem is.

You too should be worried. Because something bigger than you feel comfortable thinking about may well be about to happen. I have given up trying to change people's minds, and I'm now putting my effort into being able to survive the consequences of the actions of people who think like you. Whatever the possibilities, I think mine is the more prudent course of action.

Comment: Re:If They Confiscate Your Cupcake? (Score 1) 143

by vik (#38670180) Attached to: Victorinox Makes 1TB Swiss Army Knife

I've had medical shears taken from me by Australian customs (who are even worse arseholes than the TSA) despite the fact that they are (a) not sharp, and (b) classified as exempt medical equipment.

Basically, if they don't like the look of it, it doesn't go on the plane. You have no "rights" in this respect.

Comment: Maybe in the US its ok (Score 2) 118

by vik (#38146852) Attached to: Small OSS Library Project Battles US Corporation

but this kind of behaviour is not OK in New Zealand. What if someone from NZ snuck over and trademarked "Honour" (or "Honor" on your side of the pond)?

Frankly, I'm fed up with corporations behaving like this then bleating that they are only doing it to secure their profits which justifies anything as you know. Time they got taken down a peg or two.

Microsoft

Microsoft caught with hand in cookie jar-> 1

Submitted by
dlane
dlane writes "Representatives of the NZ Open Source Society have successfully opposed a Microsoft software patent application related to XML use in representing productivity data. This was a very broad patent, found subject to prior art: i.e. a very low quality patent that shouldn't have been submitted much less granted. As it was, it took the NZOSS members and their legal team 8 years to get MS to abandon the application.

This isn't the first time they've tried this: another bad application (http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/news/F68C4D35A4AE5DD5CC257038000F4A24) was submitted to NZ's patent office although it had been disallowed in other jurisdictions (including US) due to prior art. NZOSS representatives challenged the application and were able to force MS to change the wording to the point where it was no longer seen as a threat to developers.

Whenever Microsoft claims support for "improved quality patents" realise that what they mean is "other people's patents". Feel free to highlight their hypocrisy."

Link to Original Source

The public is an old woman. Let her maunder and mumble. -- Thomas Carlyle

Working...