Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Is it promoting progress? (Score 1) 191

by uncoveror (#44886565) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: When Is Patent License Trading Not Trolling?
Patent is based on the same constitutional clause as copyright. It is meant to promote the progress of science and the useful arts by granting temporary exclusive rights to authors and inventors. A patent held by someone other than the inventor goes against that. Grabbing a buck by stifling progress is what corporations that buy patents do. I am not aware of a single case where a corporation that bought out a patent promoted progress.

Comment: Virus too narrowly defined (Score 1) 183

by uncoveror (#42451171) Attached to: Antivirus Software Performs Poorly Against New Threats
The problem with every antivirus I have ever used in my computer business, not just Norton and McAfee, is that virus is too narrowly defined. Most miss spyware and all miss scamware, which they cannot tell from legitimate competing products and shakedowns like the FBI scam. Malwarebytes or Spybot while running in safe mode are the best bet for scamware and shakedowns.

Comment: Patents are a farce (Score 1) 166

by uncoveror (#42288667) Attached to: iPhone Infringes On Sony, Nokia Patents, Says Federal Jury
Patent was supposed to protect inventions that physically exist, not vapor and certainly not subtle variations on a product that has existed for a long time. I can't think of a single thing related to cell phones that could possibly be new enough to constitute an invention. Abolishing patent outright would be a good thing.

Comment: Re:Whew! (Score 1) 506

by uncoveror (#42211839) Attached to: Republican Staffer Khanna Axed Over Copyright Memo
They are just as much the bitches of Hollywood and the recording industry as the Democrats. No one on the hill ever considers the copyright clause when entertainment industry lobbyist show up with briefcases full of cash. This memo was the only reasonable thing ever said in Washington about copyright. It is a shame that copyright terms will be perpetually extended every 20 years so Steamboat Willie won't revert back to the public domain when Mickey Mouse is a blatant rip-off of Oswald the Lucky Rabbit. Universal, Walt Disney's former employer, did not sue over it because it was understood and accepted at the time that children's cartoons are frivolous entertainment, not science and the useful arts. Disney acquired the rights to Oswald a few years ago just in case Universal would ever change their minds about that.

Comment: Re:Windows 8 isn't all that bad (Score 1) 740

by uncoveror (#42211769) Attached to: Windows 8: a 'Christmas Gift For Someone You Hate'
Most of the general public will never figure out tricks like that, and an operating system should not need third party software just to work. Most people I deal with at my computer repair business can barely check their email, and some use Google to surf the net because they aren't aware of any other way. Windows 8 will be as inaccessible to non-techies, who are the majority of PC uses, as a command line interface. It does not matter if the source code is like 7. Clicking on tiles, adding one more each time you add new software, and needing to sort through 99 you aren't looking for to find the one you are is just like Windows 3.1, an absurd leap backward. Microsoft has really screwed up this time.

Comment: Return it. (Score 1, Informative) 740

by uncoveror (#42204953) Attached to: Windows 8: a 'Christmas Gift For Someone You Hate'
I know most of the general public doesn't come here, but I will post the advice I give to them anyway. If you buy a new PC that has Windows 8, and you are lost, or just plain don't like it, return it. Even if it was a gift, what use is something that won't do what you need or is a pain to use? It doesn't make you a bad person to return it. You may have downgrade rights to Windows 7 Professional if it came with 8 Pro, but you need a Windows 7 install disc just to use them. If you try to do it anyway when your system is not covered by downgrade rights, expect no support from the manufacturer so you may have trouble finding all the device drivers.

There are off-lease refurbished computers that have Windows 7, or maybe Vista, or even XP that are a better buy. Dell even has an Ebay store to sell them. Nearly all of these are business computers which are of higher quality than home computers, as big business has the power to punish vendors who push manufactured garbage, unlike individual consumers.

If a few individuals send Microsoft nastygrams about Windows 8, it will not matter. "We got your money, sucker!" is their attitude, but if manufacturers complain that all their Windows 8 PCs are being returned, Microsoft will have to respond eventually.

Hate Windows 8? You don't have to take it, you can take it back.

+ - Google Technology Will Read Your Mind.->

Submitted by
uncoveror writes "Do you ever want to search for something, but aren't sure how to put it into words? Do Google, Yahoo and Bing spit back off-topic junk every time you try? Google thinks they will have a solution for this problem by around 2015. Their system, if it works, will be able to directly interface the human brain, so you don't have to put it into words.

"Wi-Fi is the key to the whole thing...It turns out that if we simultaneously use the 2.4 GHz and 5.0 GHz bands, we can make a wireless connection to the brain. This is easily done now that dual band Wi-Fi gear is becoming common.""

Link to Original Source

"Ada is the work of an architect, not a computer scientist." - Jean Icbiah, inventor of Ada, weenie