I think you a word out.

And the author's considered response and explanation of the claims:

http://donpmitchell.blogspot.com/2012/01/life-forms-on-venus-probably-not.html

Note that Don has access to the original Venera raw data and isn't working from the usual poor quality photos.

Er, sorry. Try this newer page:

http://www.mentallandscape.com/C_CatalogVenus.htm

See this site for the best processed pictures from the Venera missions. Absolutely fascinating stuff those Russians did then.

http://www.mentallandscape.com/V_DigitalImages.htm

I think you mean "Pedants' Society", unless you're the sole member.

It isn't the same. The package would have been falling faster at 5000m than it was at ground level, and the impact onto a surface at that height would have been larger.

For this reason, landing on Venus is a doddle as 90atm pressure means you barely need parachutes. Surviving after landing is a different matter, of course.

I'm still waiting for the summary to finish...

I've been using Django for a while now on my web app, having moved away from home-brewed PHP. Very easy to use, and encourages well-written and elegant code.

What, when Chrysler were involved?

As a counter-point, I built my web app on Django after messing with PHP for too long, and love it. It's clean, easy to understand and the documentation is pretty good - although I agree it could be better, but then it's free and I can contribute... My app has been Django-powered for four years now and is fairly complex from a data point of view.