Link to Original Source
Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!
Link to Original Source
The difference between "depressed narcissistic arsehole" and "perfectly normal narcissistic arsehole" isn't as far as you'd think.
I think if one is a depressed anything at all they should not be allowed to control the fate of hundreds of people. If a doctor finds any hint of depression then the airline and maybe FAA should be notified. Fuck doctor patient confidentiality when peoples' lives are directly at stake.
I think the greatest threat is not that passwords are too simple, but passwords are re-used.
Yes, that is a huge issue, led to, in part, by complex rules.
I once queried one of my client's security tables to find the instances where multiple users had the same password (stored as a hash). Even though I expected some repetition, I was shocked at how many people had the same passwords.
And one more gripe: When I am limited to between 8 and 12 characters. WTF!? My passwords are dead easy to remember, but impossible to guess. And over 12 characters. Needless to say, I never remember that 8-12 char password.
It was dead either way. Either ISPs were going to go all cowboy or the gov was. I would rather have the gov do it after seeing how long and hard the ISPs fucked us. At least the you can get the gov to tie its own hands once in a while.
On the other hand, when the government goes "all coqboy" they can literally tie our hands as they wield the full weight of the law.
The Perfect Anything depends upon the person using it, and the needs of that person.
So you are saying the Perfect Gaming Mouse should have a vagina?
Companies and online entities need to learn that when you force people to use a capital letter, a number, and a symbol, that most likely the first letter will be the capital letter, the number will be 1, and the symbol will be !. Or maybe @. If they foist a wacky password or require one based on complex rules, it will either be written down, or be the most simple implementation of the rules.
Enforce minimum length. Allow spaces. Make a comparatively small alphabet have sufficient entropy to withstand brute force.
It's a nifty idea, but the major problem is that it would have to go through Russia.
I'm sure buried somewhere in an engineering spec is the requirement that it support a weight that coincidentally is the same as that of a Russian tank division.
I coulda told you that with my Atari 2600 joystick...
I coulda told you that with my abacus...
We consider ourselves very "fuzzy" computers, but ultimately we make a decision (or decide not to make one, which is the same to the person getting hit by the trolley). Programming "fat" or "very fat," similarly, could be "looks like this picture of Honey Boo Boo's mom." But even that fuzzy logic, at some point, is a pre-programmed threshold that leads to a binary decision.
But at least it's just the introductory sentence for a reasonable point, whereas your smug asshole comment is all we got.
Except that "reasonable point" hinges upon the notion that Facebook isn't a choice.
But it's not really a choice. Too many people use Facebook that it's such an inconvenience to not use it.
That may, in fact, be the dumbest thing written on the internet. At least so far today.
We could set up speed cameras to ticket everyone who's speeding. We don't. We could just mandate in-car GPS tracking and not even allow speeding in the first place.
We could also sell the Constitution to Kimberly-Clarke Corporation and have it turned into toilet paper. On second thought, I'd rather we defer your Orwellian Nightmare until Google self-driving cars have replaced personal autos.
I don't want a fucking idiot driving down my street too fast whether he has no money or is a millionaire. And I certainly don't want millionaires DELIBERATELY breaking the law because the consequences are so fucking pathetic to them that it will never matter.
I have known people who lost their license for repeated offenses, in one case permanently (is a specific state, as this is not a federal matter). The ability to pay a fine doesn't mean they can go on in perpetuity offending.
So what about a fine that devastates a poor person while at the same time being not a measurable punishment to a rich person makes it truly equal under the law? If a fine applied the same level of hardship to both rich and poor, that tells me it's treating all people equally.
No one is compelled to speed, and the fines aren't shrouded in mystery if one takes the time to find out what they are (other than the obvious way: getting pulled over).